-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Placement in/box refinement #1426
Changes from 1 commit
2d418f6
8fad6e9
b05f420
80f76ed
42cfbd0
1a65885
55aeff8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,312 @@ | ||
- Feature Name: placement_traits | ||
- Start Date: 2015-12-21 | ||
- RFC PR: (leave this empty) | ||
- Rust Issue: (leave this empty) | ||
|
||
# Summary | ||
[summary]: #summary | ||
|
||
This RFC amends RFC #0809 to reduce the number of traits involved, take | ||
allocators into account, and pin down the story on DST placement. | ||
|
||
## Traits | ||
|
||
There are now three traits: | ||
|
||
1. `Placer` -- Placement in syntax: `let owner = PLACE <- value`. | ||
2. `Boxer` -- Box syntax: `let boxed: Box<_> = box value`. | ||
3. `Place` -- An "out" pointer. | ||
|
||
## Allocators | ||
|
||
Boxer's now make Places from Allocators. This means that any type implementing | ||
`Boxer` can be allocated with any Allocator using placement in syntax (see the | ||
detailed design for more). | ||
|
||
## DSTs | ||
|
||
`Boxer::make_place` and `Placer::make_place` are bounded by `Data: Sized` to | ||
future proof against DST placement. | ||
|
||
Furthermore, this RFC explicitly defines the guarantees of when/where | ||
`Placer::make_place` will be called. | ||
|
||
# Detailed design | ||
[design]: #detailed-design | ||
|
||
The new trait hierarchy is as follows: | ||
|
||
```rust | ||
/// Interface to implementations of `PLACE <- EXPR`. | ||
/// | ||
/// `PLACE <- EXPR` effectively desugars into: | ||
/// | ||
/// ```rust,ignore | ||
/// let p = PLACE; | ||
/// let mut place = Placer::make_place(p); | ||
/// let raw_place = Place::pointer(&mut place); | ||
/// let value = EXPR; | ||
/// unsafe { | ||
/// std::ptr::write(raw_place, value); | ||
/// Place::finalize(place) | ||
/// } | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. For inference to work, all of this (and the |
||
/// ``` | ||
/// | ||
/// The type of `PLACE <- EXPR` is derived from the type of `PLACE` and the | ||
/// context. If the type of `PLACE` is `P`, then the final type of the | ||
/// expression is some owner such that `P` implements `Placer<typeof(EXPR), Owner>`. | ||
/// | ||
/// Values for types implementing this trait usually are transient | ||
/// intermediate values (e.g. the return value of `Vec::back`) | ||
/// or `Copy`, since the `make_place` method takes `self` by value. | ||
pub trait Placer<Data: ?Sized, Owner> { | ||
/// `Place` is the intermedate agent guarding the | ||
/// uninitialized state for `Data`. | ||
type Place: Place<Data, Owner=Owner>; | ||
|
||
/// Creates a fresh place from `self`. | ||
fn make_place(self) -> Self::Place | ||
where Data: Sized; | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Core trait for the `box EXPR` form. | ||
/// | ||
/// `box EXPR` effectively desugars into: | ||
/// | ||
/// ```rust,ignore | ||
/// let mut place = Boxer::make_place(Default::default()); | ||
/// let raw_place = Place::pointer(&mut place); | ||
/// let value = EXPR; | ||
/// unsafe { | ||
/// ::std::ptr::write(raw_place, value); | ||
/// Place::finalize(place) | ||
/// } | ||
/// ``` | ||
/// | ||
/// The type of `box EXPR` is supplied from its surrounding | ||
/// context; in the above expansion, the result type `T` is used | ||
/// to determine which implementation of `Boxer` to use, and that | ||
/// `<T as Boxer>` in turn dictates determines both which `Allocator` | ||
/// to use and which implementation of `Place` to use. | ||
pub trait Boxer<Data: ?Sized, A>: Sized | ||
where A: Allocator | ||
{ | ||
/// The place that will negotiate the storage of the data. | ||
type Place: Place<Data, Owner=Self>; | ||
|
||
/// Creates a globally fresh place from a given allocator. | ||
fn make_place(allocator: A) -> Self::Place | ||
where Data: Sized; | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Both `PLACE <- EXPR` and `box EXPR` desugar into expressions | ||
/// that allocate an intermediate "place" that holds uninitialized | ||
/// state. The desugaring evaluates EXPR, and writes the result at | ||
/// the address returned by the `pointer` method of this trait. | ||
/// | ||
/// A `Place` can be thought of as a special representation for a | ||
/// hypothetical `&uninit` reference (which Rust cannot currently | ||
/// express directly). That is, it represents a pointer to | ||
/// uninitialized storage. | ||
/// | ||
/// The client is responsible for two steps: First, initializing the | ||
/// payload (it can access its address via `pointer`). Second, | ||
/// converting the agent to an instance of the owning pointer, via the | ||
/// appropriate `finalize` method. | ||
/// | ||
/// If evaluating EXPR fails, then the destructor for the | ||
/// implementation of Place is run to clean up any intermediate state | ||
/// (e.g. deallocate box storage, pop a stack, etc). | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. pop a stack frame There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Fixed. |
||
pub unsafe trait Place<Data: ?Sized> { | ||
/// `Owner` is the type of the end value of both `PLACE <- EXPR` and | ||
/// `box EXPR`. | ||
/// | ||
/// Note that when `PLACE <- EXPR` is solely used for side-effecting an | ||
/// existing data-structure, e.g. `Vec::back`, then `Owner` need not carry | ||
/// any information at all (e.g. it can be the unit type `()` in that | ||
/// case). | ||
type Owner; | ||
|
||
/// Returns the address where the input value will be written. | ||
/// Note that the data at this address is generally uninitialized, | ||
/// and thus one should use `ptr::write` for initializing it. | ||
fn pointer(&mut self) -> *mut Data; | ||
|
||
/// Converts self into the final value, shifting deallocation/cleanup | ||
/// responsibilities (if any remain), over to the returned instance of | ||
/// `Owner` and forgetting self. | ||
unsafe fn finalize(self) -> Self::Owner; | ||
} | ||
|
||
``` | ||
|
||
First, `box` desugaring constructs the allocator with `Default::default()`. This | ||
means that `let boxed: Box<_, A> = box value;` works for all allocators `A: | ||
Default`. It's reasonable to construct new allocators on the fly like this | ||
because allocators are intended to be passed to collection constructors by | ||
value. | ||
|
||
Additionally, we define the following blanket impl that turns every `Allocator` | ||
into a `Placer` for all `Boxer`s. | ||
|
||
```rust | ||
impl<T, D, B> Placer<D, B> for T | ||
where T: Allocator, | ||
B: Boxer<D, T> | ||
{ | ||
type Place = B::Place; | ||
|
||
fn make_place(self) -> Self::Place | ||
where Self: Sized | ||
{ | ||
B::make_place(self) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
This means that `let boxed_thing: Type<_> = HEAP <- thing` works out of the box | ||
as long as `HEAP` is an `Allocator` and `Type` implements `Boxer`. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why are we still using There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. #39 (closed). It's not mentioned anywhere else. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. To my knowledge Also, to my knowledge, there should not be things like All in all, to me it seems like this whole section is a bit hasty and we should at least wait for There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The original intention of |
||
|
||
Finally, to support DST placement, this RFC explicitly loosens the placement | ||
protocol guarantees. Specifically, the place in placement in/new is not | ||
guaranteed to be allocated before the evaluation of the expression on the right | ||
hand side. DST placement needs this to be able to compute the size of the DST | ||
before allocating the place. This means that, in the following cases, whether or | ||
not the `Box` is ever allocated is explicitly undefined: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. hmm i guess i don't have any way to improve upon this, but I find it worrisome. ("it" being the removal of the guarantee that the place-expression is evaluated before the rhs-expression.) There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The place-expression is still evaluated first. That is, given, I don't like it but don't see any alternative that supports DST placement. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. hmm that seems like a subtle distinction you are making versus what the text says ... that is, I read the phrase "the place in placement in/new" as talking about the LHS of There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sorry about that. What I mean and what I say are not always the same thing. Does it make more sense now? |
||
|
||
```rust | ||
let _: Box<_> = box panic!(); | ||
let _: Box<_> = HEAP <- panic!(); | ||
``` | ||
|
||
For completeness, I've included the following DST placement traits to | ||
demonstrate that the current placement traits are compatible with DST placement. | ||
Note: A concrete design for returning DSTs is well outside the scope of this | ||
RFC. | ||
|
||
```rust | ||
trait DstPlacer<Data: ?Sized, Placer>: Placer<Data, Output> { | ||
fn make_place_dynamic(self, layout: Layout) -> Self::Place; | ||
} | ||
|
||
trait DstBoxer<Data: ?Sized, A>: Placer<Data, A> where A: Allocator { | ||
fn make_place_dynamic(allocator: A, layout: Layout) -> Self::Place; | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl<T, D, B> DstPlacer<D, B> for T | ||
where T: Allocator, | ||
B: DstBoxer<D, T> | ||
{ | ||
type Place = B::Place; | ||
|
||
fn make_place_dynamic(self, layout: Layout) -> Self::Place { | ||
B::make_place_dynamic(self, layout) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Assuming specialization. | ||
default impl<D, O> Placer<D, O> for T where T: DstPlacer<D, O> { | ||
fn make_place(self, layout: Layout) -> Self::Place | ||
where Self: Sized, | ||
{ | ||
self.make_place_dynamic(Layout::new::<D>()) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
default impl<D, A> Boxer<D, A> for T | ||
where T: DstBoxer<D, A> | ||
A: Allocator | ||
{ | ||
fn make_place(allocator: A) -> Self::Place | ||
where Self: Sized, | ||
{ | ||
self.make_place_dynamic(Layout::new::<D>()) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
## Choices | ||
|
||
### Placer::make_place | ||
|
||
`Placer::make_place` takes self by value. Taking self by reference as discussed | ||
in #1286 would either require an option dance, HKT to properly handle lifetimes | ||
(`type Place<'a> = ...`), or shenanigans. Furthermore, taking self by value | ||
ensures that non-copy placers are used only once. This allows panic-free | ||
allocation using `try!(place) <- thing`. | ||
|
||
### Parameterize Placer with Owner | ||
|
||
`Owner` is now a type parameter in `Placer`. This allows placement in syntax to | ||
be used with allocators. That is: | ||
|
||
```rust | ||
let boxed_thing: Box<_> = HEAP <- thing1; | ||
let rced_thing: Rc<_> = HEAP <- thing2; | ||
``` | ||
|
||
If `PLACER <- thing` can have precisely one type as in the original RFC, it | ||
wouldn't be possible to produce both `Rc`s and `Box`s (see alternatives for an | ||
alternative solution). | ||
|
||
# Drawbacks | ||
[drawbacks]: #drawbacks | ||
|
||
## Placer::make_place self by value | ||
|
||
Taking self by-value means that `vec <- value` won't work. However, `vec.back() | ||
<- value` still works just fine so I'm not convinced this is a problem. | ||
|
||
The other drawback is that `arena <- value` won't work either. One solution is | ||
to autoref the placer if necessary but, | ||
|
||
1. I'm not entirely convinced this use case is common enough to be worth it. | ||
2. This is a backwards compatible change that can be made at any time. | ||
|
||
## Place taking Owner as a type parameter | ||
|
||
This could interfere with type inference but shouldn't be an issue. In most | ||
cases, `Placer` will only be defined for one `Owner` per type. | ||
|
||
# Alternatives | ||
[alternatives]: #alternatives | ||
|
||
Instead of making the `Placer` trait take `Owner` as a type argument, we could | ||
add the following default method to the `Allocator` trait: | ||
|
||
```rust | ||
trait Allocator { | ||
/* ... */ | ||
fn emplace<B: Boxer>(self) -> BoxPlacer<Self, B> { | ||
BoxPlacer { | ||
allocator: self, | ||
_marker: PhantomData, | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
pub struct BoxPlacer<A: Allocator, B> { | ||
allocator: A, | ||
_marker: PhantomData(fn() -> B) | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl<A, B, D> Placer<D> for BoxPlacer<A, B> | ||
where B: Boxer<D>, | ||
A: Allocator, | ||
{ | ||
fn make_place(self) -> B::Place | ||
where Self: Sized, | ||
{ | ||
<B as Boxer<D>>::make_place(self) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
We could then use `let boxed = HEAP.emplace::<Type<_>>() <- value;` to select | ||
the output type. However, IMO, this is much less ergonomic. | ||
|
||
# Unresolved questions | ||
[unresolved]: #unresolved-questions | ||
|
||
Does `Place::pointer` need to return an `&mut T` (or some other special pointer) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm pretty sure it would be a mistake to have it return |
||
to ensure RVO? Should it return `std::ptr::Unique`? | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I almost feel like |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
s/Boxer’s/Boxers/?