Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

overloaded-box and placement-in #809

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 11, 2015
Merged

overloaded-box and placement-in #809

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
3927d56
initial draft
pnkfelix Feb 4, 2015
a980f3d
mention more about alternative syntax.
pnkfelix Feb 5, 2015
c081b93
add new drawback based on observing inference weakness for `Box<Trait>`.
pnkfelix Feb 5, 2015
10388e0
switched placement-`in` syntax to `in PLACE { BLOCK }`.
pnkfelix Feb 9, 2015
28a30fb
Extend Drawbacks section's discussion of type-inference and coercion
pnkfelix Feb 9, 2015
9f4b6e8
Added more complete example of drawback, taken from gists on PR 22086.
pnkfelix Feb 9, 2015
4ca4bd0
add transcript of compilation attempts, so the reader can see concretely
pnkfelix Feb 9, 2015
9d53797
Add one more note about acription and a place where it is particularly
pnkfelix Feb 9, 2015
4ec9be7
Add notes on using distinct feature-names for gating the two syntaxes…
pnkfelix Feb 9, 2015
f6df740
Note potential reason to keep `in (<place>) <expr>` over `in <place> …
pnkfelix Feb 9, 2015
2880173
Decided I care enough about the overloading+inference+coercion question
pnkfelix Feb 9, 2015
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Loading