-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Better syntax highlighting #1294
Comments
(Note: it is E-everything, because this is a large issue with isolated easy parts and harder parts) |
There was talk of a semantic highlighting LSP extension here: microsoft/vscode-languageserver-node#368 |
That is, coloring each funcition parameter in unique color? We can do that, yeah. |
Yeah, function parameter, variable bindings, maybe also module names
…On Tue, 21 May 2019, 21:10 Aleksey Kladov, ***@***.***> wrote:
Any interest in adding a mode with binding-specific coloring? I
That is, coloring each funcition parameter in unique color? We can do
that, yeah.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1294>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAE4X4QO255QSZW6SSBZZLPWRCJVANCNFSM4HOJEQ4A>
.
|
KDevelop have state of the art semantic highlighting and afaik was first IDE doing it (~2009). Through the years, they tried several approaches - I would like to suggest to look there for inspiration. Semantic highliting looks funny at first, but I'm half-blind without it now. |
That's true! Though, IntelliJ has this feature as well. If only they named it less ambitious... Like, there's much more to semantic that coloring different references differently... The basic rule of semantic highlighting in a general sense is that the reference should be colored in the same color as the corresponding definition. |
True. I just wanted to point out that generating readable and good-looking colors, in sufficient quantity, is not a purely programming problem and there is more "science" behind it (i'm not an expert myself). |
It'd also be appreciated if the colors were derived from the user's existing theme choice. I really don't want to have to supply custom colors for a specific editor plugin; I want my editor's theming to drive everything. |
microsoft/vscode-languageserver-node#368 would help here, but I don't think there's much the extension can do. The current colors are based on the default VS Code themes. |
I took a stab at it here #2061 |
2061: Theme loading and "editor.tokenColorCustomizations" support. r=lnicola a=seivan Fixes: [Issue#1294](#1294 (comment)) TODO: - [x] Load themes - [x] Load existing `ralsp`-prefixed overrides from `"workbench.colorCustomizations"`. - [x] Load overrides from `"editor.tokenColorCustomizations.textMateRules"`. - [x] Use RA tags to load `vscode.DecorationRenderOptions` (colors) from theme & overrides. - [x] Map RA tags to common TextMate scopes before loading colors. - [x] Add default scope mappings in extension. - [x] Cache mappings between settings updates. - [x] Add scope mapping configuration manifest in `package.json` - [x] Load configurable scope mappings from settings. - [x] Load JSON Scheme for text mate scope rules in settings. - [x] Update [Readme](https://github.com/seivan/rust-analyzer/blob/feature/themes/docs/user/README.md#settings). Borrowed the theme loading (`scopes.ts`) from `Tree Sitter` with some modifications to reading `"editor.tokenColorCustomizations"` for merging with loaded themes and had to remove the async portions to be able to load it from settings updates. ~Just a PoC and an idea I toyed around with a lot of room for improvement.~ For starters, certain keywords aren't part of the standard TextMate grammar, so it still reads colors from the `ralsp` prefixed values in `"workbench.colorCustomizations"`. But I think there's more value making the extension work with existing themes by maping some of the decoration tags to existing key or keys. <img width="453" alt="Screenshot 2019-11-09 at 17 43 18" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/55424/68531968-71b4e380-0318-11ea-924e-cdbb8d5eae06.png"> <img width="780" alt="Screenshot 2019-11-09 at 17 41 45" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/55424/68531950-4b8f4380-0318-11ea-8f85-24a84efaf23b.png"> <img width="468" alt="Screenshot 2019-11-09 at 17 40 29" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/55424/68531952-51852480-0318-11ea-800a-6ae9215f5368.png"> These will merge with the default ones coming with the extension, so you don't have to implement all of them and works well with overrides defined in settings. ```jsonc "editor.tokenColorCustomizations": { "textMateRules": [ { "scope": "keyword", "settings": { "fontStyle": "bold", } }, ] }, ``` Edit: The idea is to work with 90% of the themes out there by working within existing scopes available that are generally styled. It's not to say I want to erase the custom Rust scopes - those should still remain and eventually worked into a custom grammar bundle for Rust specific themes that target those, I just want to make it work with generic themes offered on the market place for now. A custom grammar bundle and themes for Rust specific scopes is out of... scope for this PR. We'll make another round to tackle those issues. Current fallbacks implemented ```typescript [ 'comment', [ 'comment', 'comment.block', 'comment.line', 'comment.block.documentation' ] ], ['string', ['string']], ['keyword', ['keyword']], ['keyword.control', ['keyword.control', 'keyword', 'keyword.other']], [ 'keyword.unsafe', ['storage.modifier', 'keyword.other', 'keyword.control', 'keyword'] ], ['function', ['entity.name.function']], ['parameter', ['variable.parameter']], ['constant', ['constant', 'variable']], ['type', ['entity.name.type']], ['builtin', ['variable.language', 'support.type', 'support.type']], ['text', ['string', 'string.quoted', 'string.regexp']], ['attribute', ['keyword']], ['literal', ['string', 'string.quoted', 'string.regexp']], ['macro', ['support.other']], ['variable', ['variable']], ['variable.mut', ['variable', 'storage.modifier']], [ 'field', [ 'variable.object.property', 'meta.field.declaration', 'meta.definition.property', 'variable.other' ] ], ['module', ['entity.name.section', 'entity.other']] ``` Co-authored-by: Seivan Heidari <seivan.heidari@icloud.com>
2061: Theme loading and "editor.tokenColorCustomizations" support. r=matklad a=seivan Fixes: [Issue#1294](#1294 (comment)) TODO: - [x] Load themes - [x] Load existing `ralsp`-prefixed overrides from `"workbench.colorCustomizations"`. - [x] Load overrides from `"editor.tokenColorCustomizations.textMateRules"`. - [x] Use RA tags to load `vscode.DecorationRenderOptions` (colors) from theme & overrides. - [x] Map RA tags to common TextMate scopes before loading colors. - [x] Add default scope mappings in extension. - [x] Cache mappings between settings updates. - [x] Add scope mapping configuration manifest in `package.json` - [x] Load configurable scope mappings from settings. - [x] Load JSON Scheme for text mate scope rules in settings. - [x] Update [Readme](https://github.com/seivan/rust-analyzer/blob/feature/themes/docs/user/README.md#settings). Borrowed the theme loading (`scopes.ts`) from `Tree Sitter` with some modifications to reading `"editor.tokenColorCustomizations"` for merging with loaded themes and had to remove the async portions to be able to load it from settings updates. ~Just a PoC and an idea I toyed around with a lot of room for improvement.~ For starters, certain keywords aren't part of the standard TextMate grammar, so it still reads colors from the `ralsp` prefixed values in `"workbench.colorCustomizations"`. But I think there's more value making the extension work with existing themes by maping some of the decoration tags to existing key or keys. <img width="453" alt="Screenshot 2019-11-09 at 17 43 18" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/55424/68531968-71b4e380-0318-11ea-924e-cdbb8d5eae06.png"> <img width="780" alt="Screenshot 2019-11-09 at 17 41 45" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/55424/68531950-4b8f4380-0318-11ea-8f85-24a84efaf23b.png"> <img width="468" alt="Screenshot 2019-11-09 at 17 40 29" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/55424/68531952-51852480-0318-11ea-800a-6ae9215f5368.png"> These will merge with the default ones coming with the extension, so you don't have to implement all of them and works well with overrides defined in settings. ```jsonc "editor.tokenColorCustomizations": { "textMateRules": [ { "scope": "keyword", "settings": { "fontStyle": "bold", } }, ] }, ``` Edit: The idea is to work with 90% of the themes out there by working within existing scopes available that are generally styled. It's not to say I want to erase the custom Rust scopes - those should still remain and eventually worked into a custom grammar bundle for Rust specific themes that target those, I just want to make it work with generic themes offered on the market place for now. A custom grammar bundle and themes for Rust specific scopes is out of... scope for this PR. We'll make another round to tackle those issues. Current fallbacks implemented ```typescript [ 'comment', [ 'comment', 'comment.block', 'comment.line', 'comment.block.documentation' ] ], ['string', ['string']], ['keyword', ['keyword']], ['keyword.control', ['keyword.control', 'keyword', 'keyword.other']], [ 'keyword.unsafe', ['storage.modifier', 'keyword.other', 'keyword.control', 'keyword'] ], ['function', ['entity.name.function']], ['parameter', ['variable.parameter']], ['constant', ['constant', 'variable']], ['type', ['entity.name.type']], ['builtin', ['variable.language', 'support.type', 'support.type']], ['text', ['string', 'string.quoted', 'string.regexp']], ['attribute', ['keyword']], ['literal', ['string', 'string.quoted', 'string.regexp']], ['macro', ['support.other']], ['variable', ['variable']], ['variable.mut', ['variable', 'storage.modifier']], [ 'field', [ 'variable.object.property', 'meta.field.declaration', 'meta.definition.property', 'variable.other' ] ], ['module', ['entity.name.section', 'entity.other']] ``` Co-authored-by: Seivan Heidari <seivan.heidari@icloud.com>
2061: Theme loading and "editor.tokenColorCustomizations" support. r=matklad a=seivan Fixes: [Issue#1294](rust-lang/rust-analyzer#1294 (comment)) TODO: - [x] Load themes - [x] Load existing `ralsp`-prefixed overrides from `"workbench.colorCustomizations"`. - [x] Load overrides from `"editor.tokenColorCustomizations.textMateRules"`. - [x] Use RA tags to load `vscode.DecorationRenderOptions` (colors) from theme & overrides. - [x] Map RA tags to common TextMate scopes before loading colors. - [x] Add default scope mappings in extension. - [x] Cache mappings between settings updates. - [x] Add scope mapping configuration manifest in `package.json` - [x] Load configurable scope mappings from settings. - [x] Load JSON Scheme for text mate scope rules in settings. - [x] Update [Readme](https://github.com/seivan/rust-analyzer/blob/feature/themes/docs/user/README.md#settings). Borrowed the theme loading (`scopes.ts`) from `Tree Sitter` with some modifications to reading `"editor.tokenColorCustomizations"` for merging with loaded themes and had to remove the async portions to be able to load it from settings updates. ~Just a PoC and an idea I toyed around with a lot of room for improvement.~ For starters, certain keywords aren't part of the standard TextMate grammar, so it still reads colors from the `ralsp` prefixed values in `"workbench.colorCustomizations"`. But I think there's more value making the extension work with existing themes by maping some of the decoration tags to existing key or keys. <img width="453" alt="Screenshot 2019-11-09 at 17 43 18" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/55424/68531968-71b4e380-0318-11ea-924e-cdbb8d5eae06.png"> <img width="780" alt="Screenshot 2019-11-09 at 17 41 45" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/55424/68531950-4b8f4380-0318-11ea-8f85-24a84efaf23b.png"> <img width="468" alt="Screenshot 2019-11-09 at 17 40 29" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/55424/68531952-51852480-0318-11ea-800a-6ae9215f5368.png"> These will merge with the default ones coming with the extension, so you don't have to implement all of them and works well with overrides defined in settings. ```jsonc "editor.tokenColorCustomizations": { "textMateRules": [ { "scope": "keyword", "settings": { "fontStyle": "bold", } }, ] }, ``` Edit: The idea is to work with 90% of the themes out there by working within existing scopes available that are generally styled. It's not to say I want to erase the custom Rust scopes - those should still remain and eventually worked into a custom grammar bundle for Rust specific themes that target those, I just want to make it work with generic themes offered on the market place for now. A custom grammar bundle and themes for Rust specific scopes is out of... scope for this PR. We'll make another round to tackle those issues. Current fallbacks implemented ```typescript [ 'comment', [ 'comment', 'comment.block', 'comment.line', 'comment.block.documentation' ] ], ['string', ['string']], ['keyword', ['keyword']], ['keyword.control', ['keyword.control', 'keyword', 'keyword.other']], [ 'keyword.unsafe', ['storage.modifier', 'keyword.other', 'keyword.control', 'keyword'] ], ['function', ['entity.name.function']], ['parameter', ['variable.parameter']], ['constant', ['constant', 'variable']], ['type', ['entity.name.type']], ['builtin', ['variable.language', 'support.type', 'support.type']], ['text', ['string', 'string.quoted', 'string.regexp']], ['attribute', ['keyword']], ['literal', ['string', 'string.quoted', 'string.regexp']], ['macro', ['support.other']], ['variable', ['variable']], ['variable.mut', ['variable', 'storage.modifier']], [ 'field', [ 'variable.object.property', 'meta.field.declaration', 'meta.definition.property', 'variable.other' ] ], ['module', ['entity.name.section', 'entity.other']] ``` Co-authored-by: Seivan Heidari <seivan.heidari@icloud.com>
TreeSitter plugin shows that it is actually possible to implement decent highlighting with the current API.
Things we should steal:
Note that we need to make our internal highlightling infra "enterprise-ready" as well :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: