Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove approx_constant known problems #4027

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2019

Conversation

kraai
Copy link
Contributor

@kraai kraai commented Apr 24, 2019

Fixes #4025.

changelog: Remove approx_constant's documentation's "Known problems" section.

@phansch
Copy link
Member

phansch commented Apr 24, 2019

@bors r+

thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 24, 2019

📌 Commit 5c7349d has been approved by phansch

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 24, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 5c7349d with merge 573eb37...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2019
…phansch

Remove approx_constant known problems

Fixes #4025.

changelog: Remove `approx_constant`'s documentation's "Known problems" section.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 24, 2019

💥 Test timed out

@phansch
Copy link
Member

phansch commented Apr 24, 2019

@bors retry

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2019
…phansch

Remove approx_constant known problems

Fixes #4025.

changelog: Remove `approx_constant`'s documentation's "Known problems" section.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 24, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 5c7349d with merge 46af9c8...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 24, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: phansch
Pushing 46af9c8 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 5c7349d into rust-lang:master Apr 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

approx_constant "Known problems" section is incorrect
3 participants