Move cmp_in_dominator_order out of graph dominator computation

Dominator-order information is only needed for coverage graphs, and is easy
enough to collect by just traversing the graph again.

This avoids wasted work when computing graph dominators for any other purpose.

compiler/rustc_data_structures/src/graph/dominators/mod.rs

@@ -9,8 +9,6 @@
 //! Thomas Lengauer and Robert Endre Tarjan.
 //! <https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/spr03/cs423/download/dominators.pdf>
 
-use std::cmp::Ordering;
-
 use rustc_index::{Idx, IndexSlice, IndexVec};
 
 use super::ControlFlowGraph;
@@ -64,9 +62,6 @@ fn is_small_path_graph<G: ControlFlowGraph>(g: &G) -> bool {
 }
 
 fn dominators_impl<G: ControlFlowGraph>(graph: &G) -> Inner<G::Node> {
-    // compute the post order index (rank) for each node
-    let mut post_order_rank = IndexVec::from_elem_n(0, graph.num_nodes());
-
     // We allocate capacity for the full set of nodes, because most of the time
     // most of the nodes *are* reachable.
     let mut parent: IndexVec<PreorderIndex, PreorderIndex> =
@@ -83,12 +78,10 @@ fn dominators_impl<G: ControlFlowGraph>(graph: &G) -> Inner<G::Node> {
     pre_order_to_real.push(graph.start_node());
     parent.push(PreorderIndex::ZERO); // the parent of the root node is the root for now.
     real_to_pre_order[graph.start_node()] = Some(PreorderIndex::ZERO);
-    let mut post_order_idx = 0;
 
     // Traverse the graph, collecting a number of things:
     //
     // * Preorder mapping (to it, and back to the actual ordering)
-    // * Postorder mapping (used exclusively for `cmp_in_dominator_order` on the final product)
     // * Parents for each vertex in the preorder tree
     //
     // These are all done here rather than through one of the 'standard'
@@ -104,8 +97,6 @@ fn dominators_impl<G: ControlFlowGraph>(graph: &G) -> Inner<G::Node> {
                 continue 'recurse;
             }
         }
-        post_order_rank[pre_order_to_real[frame.pre_order_idx]] = post_order_idx;
-        post_order_idx += 1;
 
         stack.pop();
     }
@@ -282,7 +273,7 @@ fn dominators_impl<G: ControlFlowGraph>(graph: &G) -> Inner<G::Node> {
 
     let time = compute_access_time(start_node, &immediate_dominators);
 
-    Inner { post_order_rank, immediate_dominators, time }
+    Inner { immediate_dominators, time }
 }
 
 /// Evaluate the link-eval virtual forest, providing the currently minimum semi
@@ -348,7 +339,6 @@ fn compress(
 /// Tracks the list of dominators for each node.
 #[derive(Clone, Debug)]
 struct Inner<N: Idx> {
-    post_order_rank: IndexVec<N, usize>,
     // Even though we track only the immediate dominator of each node, it's
     // possible to get its full list of dominators by looking up the dominator
     // of each dominator.
@@ -379,17 +369,6 @@ impl<Node: Idx> Dominators<Node> {
         }
     }
 
-    /// Provide deterministic ordering of nodes such that, if any two nodes have a dominator
-    /// relationship, the dominator will always precede the dominated. (The relative ordering
-    /// of two unrelated nodes will also be consistent, but otherwise the order has no
-    /// meaning.) This method cannot be used to determine if either Node dominates the other.
-    pub fn cmp_in_dominator_order(&self, lhs: Node, rhs: Node) -> Ordering {
-        match &self.kind {
-            Kind::Path => lhs.index().cmp(&rhs.index()),
-            Kind::General(g) => g.post_order_rank[rhs].cmp(&g.post_order_rank[lhs]),
-        }
-    }
-
     /// Returns true if `a` dominates `b`.
     ///
     /// # Panics

compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coverage/graph.rs

@@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ pub(crate) struct CoverageGraph {
     pub(crate) successors: IndexVec<BasicCoverageBlock, Vec<BasicCoverageBlock>>,
     pub(crate) predecessors: IndexVec<BasicCoverageBlock, Vec<BasicCoverageBlock>>,
     dominators: Option<Dominators<BasicCoverageBlock>>,
+    /// Allows nodes to be compared in some total order such that _if_
+    /// `a` dominates `b`, then `a < b`. If two nodes don't dominate each other,
+    /// their relative order is consistent but arbitrary.
+    dominator_order_rank: IndexVec<BasicCoverageBlock, u32>,
 }
 
 impl CoverageGraph {
@@ -54,10 +58,27 @@ impl CoverageGraph {
             }
         }
 
-        let mut this = Self { bcbs, bb_to_bcb, successors, predecessors, dominators: None };
+        let num_nodes = bcbs.len();
+        let mut this = Self {
+            bcbs,
+            bb_to_bcb,
+            successors,
+            predecessors,
+            dominators: None,
+            dominator_order_rank: IndexVec::from_elem_n(0, num_nodes),
+        };
+        assert_eq!(num_nodes, this.num_nodes());
 
         this.dominators = Some(dominators::dominators(&this));
 
+        // The dominator rank of each node is just its index in a reverse-postorder traversal.
+        let reverse_post_order = graph::iterate::reverse_post_order(&this, this.start_node());
+        // The coverage graph is created by traversal, so all nodes are reachable.
+        assert_eq!(reverse_post_order.len(), this.num_nodes());
+        for (rank, bcb) in (0u32..).zip(reverse_post_order) {
+            this.dominator_order_rank[bcb] = rank;
+        }
+
         // The coverage graph's entry-point node (bcb0) always starts with bb0,
         // which never has predecessors. Any other blocks merged into bcb0 can't
         // have multiple (coverage-relevant) predecessors, so bcb0 always has
@@ -162,7 +183,7 @@ impl CoverageGraph {
         a: BasicCoverageBlock,
         b: BasicCoverageBlock,
     ) -> Ordering {
-        self.dominators.as_ref().unwrap().cmp_in_dominator_order(a, b)
+        self.dominator_order_rank[a].cmp(&self.dominator_order_rank[b])
     }
 
     /// Returns the source of this node's sole in-edge, if it has exactly one.