-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Rollup merge of #98633 - c410-f3r:yet-another-let-chain, r=estebank
Fix last `let_chains` blocker In order to forbid things like `let x = (let y = 1);` or `if let a = 1 && { let x = let y = 1; } {}`, the parser **HAS** to know the context of `let`. This context thing is not a surprise in the parser because you can see **a lot** of ad hoc fixes mixing parsing logic with validation logic creating code that looks more like spaghetti with tomato sauce. To make things even greater, a new ad hoc fix was added to only allow `let`s in a valid `let_chains` context by checking the previously processed token. This was the only solution I could think of and believe me, I thought about it for a long time 👍 In the long term, it should be preferable to segregate different responsibilities or create a more robust and cleaner parser framework. cc #94927 cc #53667
- Loading branch information
Showing
9 changed files
with
827 additions
and
301 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.