Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Auto merge of #102676 - cuviper:beta-next, r=cuviper
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
[beta] backports

* Avoid duplicating StorageLive in let-else #101894
* Re-add HRTB implied static bug note #101924
* Revert "Copy stage0 binaries into stage0-sysroot" #101942
* implied_bounds: deal with inference vars #102016
* fix ConstProp handling of written_only_inside_own_block_locals #102045
* Fix wrongly refactored Lift impl #102088
* Fix a typo “pararmeter” in error message #102119
* Deny associated type bindings within associated type bindings #102338
* Continue migration of CSS themes #101934
* Fix search result colors #102369
* Fix unwind drop glue for if-then scopes #102394
* Revert "Use getentropy when possible on all Apple platforms" #102693
* Fix associated type bindings with anon const in GAT position #102336
* Revert perf-regression 101620 #102064
* `EscapeAscii` is not an `ExactSizeIterator` #99880
  • Loading branch information
bors committed Oct 10, 2022
2 parents e5da984 + f73da69 commit da7ffa2
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 95 changed files with 1,967 additions and 1,075 deletions.
5 changes: 1 addition & 4 deletions compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/constraints/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -21,10 +21,7 @@ pub(crate) struct OutlivesConstraintSet<'tcx> {

impl<'tcx> OutlivesConstraintSet<'tcx> {
pub(crate) fn push(&mut self, constraint: OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>) {
debug!(
"OutlivesConstraintSet::push({:?}: {:?} @ {:?}",
constraint.sup, constraint.sub, constraint.locations
);
debug!("OutlivesConstraintSet::push({:?})", constraint);
if constraint.sup == constraint.sub {
// 'a: 'a is pretty uninteresting
return;
Expand Down
30 changes: 21 additions & 9 deletions compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/explain_borrow.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::{self, RegionVid, TyCtxt};
use rustc_span::symbol::{kw, Symbol};
use rustc_span::{sym, DesugaringKind, Span};

use crate::region_infer::BlameConstraint;
use crate::region_infer::{BlameConstraint, ExtraConstraintInfo};
use crate::{
borrow_set::BorrowData, nll::ConstraintDescription, region_infer::Cause, MirBorrowckCtxt,
WriteKind,
Expand All @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ pub(crate) enum BorrowExplanation<'tcx> {
span: Span,
region_name: RegionName,
opt_place_desc: Option<String>,
extra_info: Vec<ExtraConstraintInfo>,
},
Unexplained,
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -243,6 +244,7 @@ impl<'tcx> BorrowExplanation<'tcx> {
ref region_name,
ref opt_place_desc,
from_closure: _,
ref extra_info,
} => {
region_name.highlight_region_name(err);

Expand All @@ -268,6 +270,14 @@ impl<'tcx> BorrowExplanation<'tcx> {
);
};

for extra in extra_info {
match extra {
ExtraConstraintInfo::PlaceholderFromPredicate(span) => {
err.span_note(*span, format!("due to current limitations in the borrow checker, this implies a `'static` lifetime"));
}
}
}

self.add_lifetime_bound_suggestion_to_diagnostic(err, &category, span, region_name);
}
_ => {}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -309,16 +319,17 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> {
&self,
borrow_region: RegionVid,
outlived_region: RegionVid,
) -> (ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, bool, Span, Option<RegionName>) {
let BlameConstraint { category, from_closure, cause, variance_info: _ } = self
.regioncx
.best_blame_constraint(borrow_region, NllRegionVariableOrigin::FreeRegion, |r| {
self.regioncx.provides_universal_region(r, borrow_region, outlived_region)
});
) -> (ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, bool, Span, Option<RegionName>, Vec<ExtraConstraintInfo>) {
let (blame_constraint, extra_info) = self.regioncx.best_blame_constraint(
borrow_region,
NllRegionVariableOrigin::FreeRegion,
|r| self.regioncx.provides_universal_region(r, borrow_region, outlived_region),
);
let BlameConstraint { category, from_closure, cause, .. } = blame_constraint;

let outlived_fr_name = self.give_region_a_name(outlived_region);

(category, from_closure, cause.span, outlived_fr_name)
(category, from_closure, cause.span, outlived_fr_name, extra_info)
}

/// Returns structured explanation for *why* the borrow contains the
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -390,7 +401,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> {

None => {
if let Some(region) = self.to_error_region_vid(borrow_region_vid) {
let (category, from_closure, span, region_name) =
let (category, from_closure, span, region_name, extra_info) =
self.free_region_constraint_info(borrow_region_vid, region);
if let Some(region_name) = region_name {
let opt_place_desc = self.describe_place(borrow.borrowed_place.as_ref());
Expand All @@ -400,6 +411,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> {
span,
region_name,
opt_place_desc,
extra_info,
}
} else {
debug!("Could not generate a region name");
Expand Down
14 changes: 12 additions & 2 deletions compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/region_errors.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ use crate::session_diagnostics::{
};

use super::{OutlivesSuggestionBuilder, RegionName};
use crate::region_infer::BlameConstraint;
use crate::region_infer::{BlameConstraint, ExtraConstraintInfo};
use crate::{
nll::ConstraintDescription,
region_infer::{values::RegionElement, TypeTest},
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -354,10 +354,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
) {
debug!("report_region_error(fr={:?}, outlived_fr={:?})", fr, outlived_fr);

let BlameConstraint { category, cause, variance_info, from_closure: _ } =
let (blame_constraint, extra_info) =
self.regioncx.best_blame_constraint(fr, fr_origin, |r| {
self.regioncx.provides_universal_region(r, fr, outlived_fr)
});
let BlameConstraint { category, cause, variance_info, .. } = blame_constraint;

debug!("report_region_error: category={:?} {:?} {:?}", category, cause, variance_info);

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -466,6 +467,14 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
}
}

for extra in extra_info {
match extra {
ExtraConstraintInfo::PlaceholderFromPredicate(span) => {
diag.span_note(span, format!("due to current limitations in the borrow checker, this implies a `'static` lifetime"));
}
}
}

self.buffer_error(diag);
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -557,6 +566,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
/// LL | ref_obj(x)
/// | ^^^^^^^^^^ `x` escapes the function body here
/// ```
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))]
fn report_escaping_data_error(
&self,
errci: &ErrorConstraintInfo<'tcx>,
Expand Down
49 changes: 38 additions & 11 deletions compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/region_infer/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -245,6 +245,11 @@ enum Trace<'tcx> {
NotVisited,
}

#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
pub enum ExtraConstraintInfo {
PlaceholderFromPredicate(Span),
}

impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
/// Creates a new region inference context with a total of
/// `num_region_variables` valid inference variables; the first N
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1818,10 +1823,9 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
fr1_origin: NllRegionVariableOrigin,
fr2: RegionVid,
) -> (ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, ObligationCause<'tcx>) {
let BlameConstraint { category, cause, .. } =
self.best_blame_constraint(fr1, fr1_origin, |r| {
self.provides_universal_region(r, fr1, fr2)
});
let BlameConstraint { category, cause, .. } = self
.best_blame_constraint(fr1, fr1_origin, |r| self.provides_universal_region(r, fr1, fr2))
.0;
(category, cause)
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2010,7 +2014,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
from_region: RegionVid,
from_region_origin: NllRegionVariableOrigin,
target_test: impl Fn(RegionVid) -> bool,
) -> BlameConstraint<'tcx> {
) -> (BlameConstraint<'tcx>, Vec<ExtraConstraintInfo>) {
// Find all paths
let (path, target_region) =
self.find_constraint_paths_between_regions(from_region, target_test).unwrap();
Expand All @@ -2026,6 +2030,18 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
);

let mut extra_info = vec![];
for constraint in path.iter() {
let outlived = constraint.sub;
let Some(origin) = self.var_infos.get(outlived) else { continue; };
let RegionVariableOrigin::Nll(NllRegionVariableOrigin::Placeholder(p)) = origin.origin else { continue; };
debug!(?constraint, ?p);
let ConstraintCategory::Predicate(span) = constraint.category else { continue; };
extra_info.push(ExtraConstraintInfo::PlaceholderFromPredicate(span));
// We only want to point to one
break;
}

// We try to avoid reporting a `ConstraintCategory::Predicate` as our best constraint.
// Instead, we use it to produce an improved `ObligationCauseCode`.
// FIXME - determine what we should do if we encounter multiple `ConstraintCategory::Predicate`
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2073,6 +2089,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
from_closure,
cause: ObligationCause::new(span, CRATE_HIR_ID, cause_code),
variance_info: constraint.variance_info,
outlives_constraint: *constraint,
}
})
.collect();
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2174,7 +2191,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
let best_choice =
if blame_source { range.rev().find(find_region) } else { range.find(find_region) };

debug!(?best_choice, ?blame_source);
debug!(?best_choice, ?blame_source, ?extra_info);

if let Some(i) = best_choice {
if let Some(next) = categorized_path.get(i + 1) {
Expand All @@ -2183,7 +2200,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
{
// The return expression is being influenced by the return type being
// impl Trait, point at the return type and not the return expr.
return next.clone();
return (next.clone(), extra_info);
}
}

Expand All @@ -2203,7 +2220,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
}
}

return categorized_path[i].clone();
return (categorized_path[i].clone(), extra_info);
}

// If that search fails, that is.. unusual. Maybe everything
Expand All @@ -2213,7 +2230,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
categorized_path.sort_by(|p0, p1| p0.category.cmp(&p1.category));
debug!("sorted_path={:#?}", categorized_path);

categorized_path.remove(0)
(categorized_path.remove(0), extra_info)
}

pub(crate) fn universe_info(&self, universe: ty::UniverseIndex) -> UniverseInfo<'tcx> {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2295,7 +2312,13 @@ impl<'tcx> ClosureRegionRequirementsExt<'tcx> for ClosureRegionRequirements<'tcx
outlives_requirement={:?}",
region, outlived_region, outlives_requirement,
);
ty::Binder::dummy(ty::OutlivesPredicate(region.into(), outlived_region))
(
ty::Binder::dummy(ty::OutlivesPredicate(
region.into(),
outlived_region,
)),
ConstraintCategory::BoringNoLocation,
)
}

ClosureOutlivesSubject::Ty(ty) => {
Expand All @@ -2305,7 +2328,10 @@ impl<'tcx> ClosureRegionRequirementsExt<'tcx> for ClosureRegionRequirements<'tcx
outlives_requirement={:?}",
ty, outlived_region, outlives_requirement,
);
ty::Binder::dummy(ty::OutlivesPredicate(ty.into(), outlived_region))
(
ty::Binder::dummy(ty::OutlivesPredicate(ty.into(), outlived_region)),
ConstraintCategory::BoringNoLocation,
)
}
}
})
Expand All @@ -2319,4 +2345,5 @@ pub struct BlameConstraint<'tcx> {
pub from_closure: bool,
pub cause: ObligationCause<'tcx>,
pub variance_info: ty::VarianceDiagInfo<'tcx>,
pub outlives_constraint: OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>,
}
26 changes: 21 additions & 5 deletions compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/canonical.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
/// constraints should occur within this method so that those
/// constraints can be properly localized!**
#[instrument(skip(self, op), level = "trace")]
pub(super) fn fully_perform_op<R, Op>(
pub(super) fn fully_perform_op<R: fmt::Debug, Op>(
&mut self,
locations: Locations,
category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>,
Expand All @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {

let TypeOpOutput { output, constraints, error_info } = op.fully_perform(self.infcx)?;

debug!(?output, ?constraints);

if let Some(data) = constraints {
self.push_region_constraints(locations, category, data);
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -102,6 +104,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
);
}

#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))]
pub(super) fn normalize_and_prove_instantiated_predicates(
&mut self,
// Keep this parameter for now, in case we start using
Expand All @@ -116,8 +119,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
.zip(instantiated_predicates.spans.into_iter())
{
debug!(?predicate);
let predicate = self.normalize(predicate, locations);
self.prove_predicate(predicate, locations, ConstraintCategory::Predicate(span));
let category = ConstraintCategory::Predicate(span);
let predicate = self.normalize_with_category(predicate, locations, category);
self.prove_predicate(predicate, locations, category);
}
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -153,15 +157,27 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
})
}

#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
pub(super) fn normalize<T>(&mut self, value: T, location: impl NormalizeLocation) -> T
where
T: type_op::normalize::Normalizable<'tcx> + fmt::Display + Copy + 'tcx,
{
self.normalize_with_category(value, location, ConstraintCategory::Boring)
}

#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
pub(super) fn normalize_with_category<T>(
&mut self,
value: T,
location: impl NormalizeLocation,
category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>,
) -> T
where
T: type_op::normalize::Normalizable<'tcx> + fmt::Display + Copy + 'tcx,
{
let param_env = self.param_env;
self.fully_perform_op(
location.to_locations(),
ConstraintCategory::Boring,
category,
param_env.and(type_op::normalize::Normalize::new(value)),
)
.unwrap_or_else(|NoSolution| {
Expand Down
Loading

0 comments on commit da7ffa2

Please sign in to comment.