-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve error output of “Detect diff markers in the parser” #113826
Labels
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
D-papercut
Diagnostics: An error or lint that needs small tweaks.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Comments
rustbot
added
the
needs-triage
This issue may need triage. Remove it if it has been sufficiently triaged.
label
Jul 18, 2023
estebank
added
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
D-papercut
Diagnostics: An error or lint that needs small tweaks.
and removed
needs-triage
This issue may need triage. Remove it if it has been sufficiently triaged.
labels
Jul 18, 2023
Merged
@rustbot claim |
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this issue
Jun 21, 2024
Improve conflict marker recovery <!-- If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort, please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this. This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using r? <reviewer name> --> closes rust-lang#113826 r? `@estebank` since you reviewed rust-lang#115413 cc: `@rben01` since you opened up the issue in the first place
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 21, 2024
Improve conflict marker recovery <!-- If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort, please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this. This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using r? <reviewer name> --> closes rust-lang#113826 r? ``@estebank`` since you reviewed rust-lang#115413 cc: ``@rben01`` since you opened up the issue in the first place
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 21, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126125 - dev-ardi:conflict-markers, r=estebank Improve conflict marker recovery <!-- If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort, please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this. This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using r? <reviewer name> --> closes rust-lang#113826 r? ```@estebank``` since you reviewed rust-lang#115413 cc: ```@rben01``` since you opened up the issue in the first place
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
D-papercut
Diagnostics: An error or lint that needs small tweaks.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Copied from my comment in #106242:
I'd love this functionality but I'm not a huge fan of the error messages themselves.
First, I believe these markers are called conflict markers, not diff markers. (IIUC diff markers are e.g.,
+++ file.rs
.)Second, I think the intermediate markers
|
and=
should also be explained.Third, I find the
help:
tips a bit verbose — especially considering that they'll likely line wrap in most terminals — and perhaps redundant given the content of the^^^^^^^
notes. It might be better to stick thehelp:
info inrustc --explain E####
instead of showing every time this error is encountered. Not sure where I stand on thenote:
tip; it's also a bit long, and its presence might lead people away fromrustc --explain
, which is probably undesirable. (The git documentation also has a lot of extraneous info that most users wouldn't need to solve this error; they just need to know which is old and which is new,<<<<<<<
or>>>>>>>
.)Finally, I think the words “above” and “after” are a bit ambiguous; there's nearly an entire file above and below the outer conflict markers. (What's important is what's between conflict markers.) Furthermore they aren't quite accurate when there's a
|||||||
section, since that section is below the<<<<<<<
but not part of “our” code.I think the following error message would be overall clearer and more accurate:
or, if not using
diff3
,The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: