-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing Null Pointer Optimization Through Struct Indirection #19419
Comments
mitsuhiko
changed the title
Missing Null Pointer Optimization Through Indirection
Missing Null Pointer Optimization Through Struct Indirection
Nov 30, 2014
Related issue #9378 |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 29, 2014
This extends the nullable enum opt to traverse beyond just the first level to find possible fields to use as the discriminant. So now, it'll work through structs, tuples, and fixed sized arrays. This also introduces a new lang item, NonZero, that you can use to wrap raw pointers or integral types to indicate to rustc that the underlying value is known to never be 0/NULL. We then use this in Vec, Rc and Arc to have them also benefit from the nullable enum opt. As per rust-lang/rfcs#499 NonZero is not exposed via the `libstd` facade. ``` x86_64 Linux: T Option<T> (Before) Option<T> (After) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vec<int> 24 32 24 String 24 32 24 Rc<int> 8 16 8 Arc<int> 8 16 8 [Box<int>, ..2] 16 24 16 (String, uint) 32 40 32 ``` Fixes #19419. Fixes #13194. Fixes #9378. Fixes #7576.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Given a small wrapper struct around a box:
Currently there is no null pointer optimization for a usage like
Result<(), Wrapper<X>>
whereas there is forResult<(), Box<X>>
. The result in the first case will be two words whereas in the latter a single.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: