Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove rustboot "trans_const_lval bug" workaround #464

Closed
pcwalton opened this issue Jun 9, 2011 · 0 comments
Closed

Remove rustboot "trans_const_lval bug" workaround #464

pcwalton opened this issue Jun 9, 2011 · 0 comments
Labels
C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.

Comments

@pcwalton
Copy link
Contributor

pcwalton commented Jun 9, 2011

There's a lot of obsolete auto f = foo; g(f); code to work around the fact that you couldn't say g(foo); when foo was a function in rustboot. We should remove this.
keeperofdakeys pushed a commit to keeperofdakeys/rust that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2017
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#464 - mneumann:dragonfly-fixes-2016-12, r=ale…
411cafc 
…xcrichton

Dragonfly fixes 2016-12

This fixes libc again for DragonFly.
dlrobertson pushed a commit to dlrobertson/rust that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2018
@matthewjasper
Merge pull request rust-lang#464 from ehuss/grammar-fixes
81964af 
Fix some grammar issues.
GuillaumeGomez pushed a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2024
@antoyo
Merge pull request rust-lang#464 from rust-lang/sync_from_rust_2024_0…
b385428 
…3_04

Sync from rust 2024/03/04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@marijnh @pcwalton