Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cache results of type_has_pointers #517

Closed
pcwalton opened this issue Jun 18, 2011 · 1 comment
Closed

Cache results of type_has_pointers #517

pcwalton opened this issue Jun 18, 2011 · 1 comment

Comments

@pcwalton
Copy link
Contributor

At least 16.1% of translation time is spent in that function.

@pcwalton
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed in 2ba7729

lilyball added a commit to lilyball/rust that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2015
std::io does not currently expose the stdin_raw, stdout_raw, or
stderr_raw functions. According to the current plans for stdio (see RFC
rust-lang#517), raw access will likely be provided using the platform-specific
std::os::{unix,windows} modules. At the moment we don't expose any way
to do this. As such, delete all mention of the _raw functions from the
stdin/stdout/stderr function documentation.

While we're at it, remove a few `pub`s from items that aren't exposed.
This is done just to lessen the confusion experienced by anyone who
looks at the source in an attempt to find the _raw functions.
keeperofdakeys pushed a commit to keeperofdakeys/rust that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2017
keeperofdakeys pushed a commit to keeperofdakeys/rust that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2017
Add missing MSG_PEEK definition for Solaris

Fixes rust-lang#517
kazcw pushed a commit to kazcw/rust that referenced this issue Oct 23, 2018
* add large shuffle intrinsics

* add swap_bytes/to_le

* add to_be

* more tests

* improve swap_bytes tests
pdietl pushed a commit to pdietl/rust that referenced this issue Apr 23, 2020
ZuseZ4 pushed a commit to EnzymeAD/rust that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant