Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stop building clang #5403

Closed
brson opened this issue Mar 15, 2013 · 3 comments
Closed

Stop building clang #5403

brson opened this issue Mar 15, 2013 · 3 comments
Labels
A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues.

Comments

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Mar 15, 2013

We are still not using it. I think this will require removing the submodule.

@graydon
Copy link
Contributor

graydon commented Mar 19, 2013

Hm. Is this just like in the sense of short-term, speed-up-builds? Or removing it entirely? I think we want it long-term, no?

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Mar 19, 2013

Yeah, just for the speedup while we're not using it.
On Mar 19, 2013 9:08 AM, "Graydon Hoare" notifications@github.com wrote:

Hm. Is this just like in the sense of short-term, speed-up-builds? Or
removing it entirely? I think we want it long-term, no?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/5403#issuecomment-15123937
.

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

Not critical for 0.6; removing milestone

@bors bors closed this as completed in bda4dd3 Mar 30, 2013
oli-obk pushed a commit to oli-obk/rust that referenced this issue May 2, 2020
Improve docs for option_option

Hint about using tri-state enums to replace legitimate uses of `Option<Option<_>>`

changelog: The docs for `option_option` now suggest using a tri-state enum
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants