Tracking issue for Pin::{into_inner, into_inner_unchecked} (feature pin_into_inner)

[Nemo157]

This is a tracking issue for Pin::into_inner and Pin::into_inner_unchecked, proposed and implemented in #60165.

[Nemo157]

@rustbot modify labels to T-libs, C-tracking-issue.

[cramertj]

@rust-lang/libs These have been available on nightly for some time with no controversy. They're pretty useful when working with Pin-- do y'all have anything you'd like to see here before merging?

[alexcrichton]

Let's see! Proposed APIs look to be:

• https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/core/pin/struct.Pin.html#method.into_inner
• https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/core/pin/struct.Pin.html#method.into_inner_unchecked

@rfcbot fcp merge

[rfcbot]

Team member @alexcrichton has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:

• @Amanieu
• @Kimundi
• @SimonSapin
• @alexcrichton
• @dtolnay
• @sfackler
• @withoutboats

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

[rfcbot]

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

[rfcbot]

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed.

The RFC will be merged soon.

[cramertj]

@alexcrichton I don't think you can r+ issues ;)

[ghedo]

Since this seems to have gone quiet again, I took the liberty of creating #63985 to do the actual stabilization.