-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
const fn ICE on nightly #65348
Comments
As the OP notes, this is closely related to #64945. To fix that problem, zero-length arrays were special-cased so that they are never marked as indirectly mutable. However, this did not extend to projections of zero-length arrays. When compiling this code, the It's unfortunate that we have to treat |
Return `false` from `needs_drop` for all zero-sized arrays. Resolves #65348. This changes the result of the `needs_drop` query from `true` to `false` for types such as `[Box<i32>; 0]`. I believe this change to be sound because a zero-sized array can never actually hold a value. This is an elegant way of resolving #65348 and #64945, but obviously it has much broader implications.
…drop, r=eddyb Return `false` from `needs_drop` for all zero-sized arrays. Resolves rust-lang#65348. This changes the result of the `needs_drop` query from `true` to `false` for types such as `[Box<i32>; 0]`. I believe this change to be sound because a zero-sized array can never actually hold a value. This is an elegant way of resolving rust-lang#65348 and rust-lang#64945, but obviously it has much broader implications.
…drop, r=eddyb Return `false` from `needs_drop` for all zero-sized arrays. Resolves rust-lang#65348. This changes the result of the `needs_drop` query from `true` to `false` for types such as `[Box<i32>; 0]`. I believe this change to be sound because a zero-sized array can never actually hold a value. This is an elegant way of resolving rust-lang#65348 and rust-lang#64945, but obviously it has much broader implications.
The following ICE's on nightly only:
Backtrace:
This ICE is the same as reported in #64945 , however the example given there currently runs fine without any errors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: