-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Shrink ast::Expr
harder
#101562
Shrink ast::Expr
harder
#101562
Conversation
Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt cc @rust-lang/rustfmt |
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit 55618ea7ce3e6a75b529e9570b37f77c777ed011 with merge 29c78f7bb22a7e545bae5ae196766f078fe7c1ac... |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Queued 29c78f7bb22a7e545bae5ae196766f078fe7c1ac with parent 4af35b8, future comparison URL. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Finished benchmarking commit (29c78f7bb22a7e545bae5ae196766f078fe7c1ac): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDEDBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Footnotes |
55618ea
to
1d91c05
Compare
Lots of nice performance wins here across all the metrics, hooray. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
1d91c05
to
1dbc69e
Compare
I fixed the conflicts. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
1dbc69e
to
3dc22c4
Compare
@petrochenkov: I have rebased again, should be ready for review. |
The cycles, wall-time, max-rss, and cache-misses results here are pretty good. |
Could not assign reviewer from: |
@bors r+ |
⌛ Testing commit 67d5cc0 with merge f6dc382af3e850df6eee3714780066c6d22fdc08... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
The error seems unrelated and spurious, but let's check again. |
cc #104563 :( |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (70fe5f0): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDEDNext Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
|
Instruction count results are mixed. But the real results are for cycles and wall-time, which show lots of improvements. @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged |
…r=petrochenkov Shrink `ast::Expr` harder r? `@ghost`
r? @ghost