Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistently write RwLock #102277

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2022
Merged

Consistently write RwLock #102277

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2022

Conversation

mgeisler
Copy link
Contributor

Before the documentation sometimes referred to an "rwlock" and sometimes to "RwLock".

Before the documentation sometimes referred to an "rwlock" and sometimes to "`RwLock`".
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @m-ou-se

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 25, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 25, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 25, 2022
@inquisitivecrystal inquisitivecrystal added the A-docs Area: documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools label Sep 25, 2022
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

m-ou-se commented Oct 11, 2022

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 11, 2022

📌 Commit f67184f has been approved by m-ou-se

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 11, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#102258 (Remove unused variable in float formatting.)
 - rust-lang#102277 (Consistently write `RwLock`)
 - rust-lang#102412 (Never panic in `thread::park` and `thread::park_timeout`)
 - rust-lang#102589 (scoped threads: pass closure through MaybeUninit to avoid invalid dangling references)
 - rust-lang#102625 (fix backtrace small typo)
 - rust-lang#102859 (Move lifetime resolution module to rustc_hir_analysis.)
 - rust-lang#102898 (rustdoc: remove unneeded `<div>` wrapper from sidebar DOM)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 387df55 into rust-lang:master Oct 11, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Oct 11, 2022
@mgeisler mgeisler deleted the rwlock branch March 23, 2023 08:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-docs Area: documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants