Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a forgotten check for NonNull::new_unchecked's precondition #103329

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2022

Conversation

saethlin
Copy link
Member

Looks like I forgot this function a while ago in #92686

r? @thomcc

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Oct 21, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 21, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 21, 2022
@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented Oct 21, 2022

Looks fine to me!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 21, 2022

📌 Commit 9b67910 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 21, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2022
…homcc

Add a forgotten check for NonNull::new_unchecked's precondition

Looks like I forgot this function a while ago in rust-lang#92686

r? `@thomcc`
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2022
…homcc

Add a forgotten check for NonNull::new_unchecked's precondition

Looks like I forgot this function a while ago in rust-lang#92686

r? ``@thomcc``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#102602 (Slightly tweak comments wrt `lint_overflowing_range_endpoint`)
 - rust-lang#103190 (rustdoc: render bounds of cross-crate GAT params)
 - rust-lang#103224 (Allow semicolon after closure within parentheses in macros)
 - rust-lang#103280 ((rust-lang#102929) Implement `String::leak` (attempt 2))
 - rust-lang#103329 (Add a forgotten check for NonNull::new_unchecked's precondition)
 - rust-lang#103346 (Adjust argument type for mutable with_metadata_of (rust-lang#75091))
 - rust-lang#103360 (Reduce false positives in msys2 detection)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 3f49f95 into rust-lang:master Oct 22, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Oct 22, 2022
@saethlin saethlin deleted the nonnull-precondition branch March 15, 2023 00:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants