Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

couple of clippy::perf fixes #104566

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2022
Merged

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 18, 2022

r? @oli-obk

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added A-translation Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 18, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 18, 2022

rustc_macros::diagnostics was changed

cc @davidtwco, @compiler-errors, @JohnTitor, @estebank, @TaKO8Ki

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Nov 18, 2022

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Nov 18, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 18, 2022

⌛ Trying commit e3036df with merge 7031b5950d8234c2064b703c5c331649294b7ebd...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 18, 2022

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 7031b5950d8234c2064b703c5c331649294b7ebd (7031b5950d8234c2064b703c5c331649294b7ebd)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (7031b5950d8234c2064b703c5c331649294b7ebd): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.3% [1.3%, 1.3%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.5% [-4.5%, -4.5%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.4% [1.4%, 1.4%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.6% [0.6%, 0.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.4% [1.4%, 1.4%] 1

@rustbot rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Nov 18, 2022
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Nov 18, 2022

This looks like the usual inliner noise on those benchmarks

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 18, 2022

📌 Commit e3036df has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 18, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2022
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104001 (Improve generating Custom entry function)
 - rust-lang#104411 (nll: correctly deal with bivariance)
 - rust-lang#104528 (Properly link `{Once,Lazy}{Cell,Lock}` in docs)
 - rust-lang#104553 (Improve accuracy of asinh and acosh)
 - rust-lang#104554 (Use `ErrorGuaranteed::unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted` less)
 - rust-lang#104566 (couple of clippy::perf fixes)
 - rust-lang#104575 (deduplicate tests)
 - rust-lang#104580 (diagnostics: only show one suggestion for method -> assoc fn)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 3c6fc06 into rust-lang:master Nov 19, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-translation Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic perf-regression Performance regression. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants