Rollup of 7 pull requests #105660
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #105660
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In a scenario like
```
struct Type;
pub trait Trait {
fn function(&mut self)
where
Self: Sized;
}
impl Trait for Type {
fn function(&mut self) {}
}
fn main() {
(&mut Type as &mut dyn Trait).function();
}
```
the problem is Sized, not the mutability of self. Thus don't emit the
"you need &T instead of &mut T" note, or the other way around, as all
it does is just invert the mutability of whatever was supplied.
Fixes rust-lang#103622.
Fix cases where the "invalid base prefix for number literal" error arises with suffixes that look erroneously capitalized but which are in fact invalid.
…r=nnethercote Refine when invalid prefix case error arises Fix cases where the "invalid base prefix for number literal" error arises with suffixes that look erroneously capitalized but which are actually invalid.
Always evaluate vecs of subdiagnostics eagerly See https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20lists!/near/310186705 for context
…env-2, r=estebank Highlight conflicting param-env candidates, again Un-reverts rust-lang#98794 (i.e. reverts rust-lang#99290). The previous time I attempted to land this PR, it was because of an incremental issue (rust-lang#99233). The repro instructions in the issue is no longer manifest the ICE -- I think it's because this ambiguity code was refactored (I think by ``@lcnr)`` to no longer store the ambiguities in the fulfillment error, but instead recompute them on the fly. The main motivation for trying to re-land this is that it fixes rust-lang#105131 by highlighting the root-cause of the issue, which is conflicting param-env candidates: ``` error[E0283]: type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `Self: Gen<'source>` | note: multiple `impl`s or `where` clauses satisfying `Self: Gen<'source>` found --> $DIR/conflicting-bounds.rs:3:1 | LL | pub trait Gen<'source> { | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ... LL | Self: for<'s> Gen<'s, Output = T>; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ error: aborting due to previous error For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0283`. ``` Fixes rust-lang#105131. Fixes (again) rust-lang#98786
Support #[track_caller] on async closures Follow up on rust-lang#105180 r? ``@compiler-errors`` cc ``@cjgillot``
Illegal sized bounds: only suggest mutability change if needed
In a scenario like
```rust
struct Type;
pub trait Trait {
fn function(&mut self)
where
Self: Sized;
}
impl Trait for Type {
fn function(&mut self) {}
}
fn main() {
(&mut Type as &mut dyn Trait).function();
}
```
the problem is Sized, not the mutability of self. Thus don't emit the "you need &T instead of &mut T" note, or the other way around, as all it does is just invert the mutability of whatever was supplied.
Fixes rust-lang#103622.
Add a test for rust-lang#92481 The test was copied ad-hoc from rust-lang#92481, but I can't get the test to pass, because of needing to get twice the same error on the last line of the source. Closes rust-lang#92481
…davidtwco Don't require owned data in `MaybeStorageLive` Small improvement that avoids a clone. I don't expect this to have any noticeable perf effects, but better to have it than not to. r? `@tmiasko`
rustbot
added
A-query-system
|
Hi @Dylan-DPC , can you please clean up after yourself and analyze your previous failed rollups before opening YET ANOTHER rollup with the same/overlapping commits? |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #105686) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
MaybeStorageLive#105659 (Don't require owned data inMaybeStorageLive)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup