Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 6 pull requests #106480

Closed

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

compiler-errors and others added 26 commits December 17, 2022 22:26
This commit changes `.sidebar a:hover:not(.logo-container)` to add the `:not()` pseudo-class, retaining the old appearance of the logo when mousing over it.

This didn't used to be necessary because the `a.sidebar-logo` was `display:inline`, and was what got the `background` changed on hover, while the `div.logo-container` inside it was `display:block`. This resulted in the hover rule not having any effect, because the logo-container box was not actually nested inside the sidebar-logo box:

https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visuren.html#anonymous-block-level

> When an inline box contains an in-flow block-level box, the inline box (and its inline ancestors within the same line box) are broken around the block-level box (and any block-level siblings that are consecutive or separated only by collapsible whitespace and/or out-of-flow elements), splitting the inline box into two boxes (even if either side is empty), one on each side of the block-level box(es). The line boxes before the break and after the break are enclosed in anonymous block boxes, and the block-level box becomes a sibling of those anonymous boxes. When such an inline box is affected by relative positioning, any resulting translation also affects the block-level box contained in the inline box.
This allows the expressions to have more accurate types
when showing inference steps.
- Only point at a the single expression where the found type was first
  inferred.
- Find method call argument that might have caused the found type to be
  inferred.
- Provide structured suggestion.
- Apply some review comments.
- Tweak wording.
```rust
fn main() {
    let v = Vec::new();
    v.push(0);
    v.push(0);
    v.push("");
}
```

now produces

```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
  --> $DIR/point-at-inference-3.rs:6:12
   |
LL |     v.push(0);
   |            - this is of type `{integer}`, which makes `v` to be inferred as `Vec<{integer}>`
...
LL |     v.push("");
   |       ---- ^^ expected integer, found `&str`
   |       |
   |       arguments to this function are incorrect
   |
note: associated function defined here
  --> $SRC_DIR/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs:LL:COL
```
…ckh726

Account for return-position `impl Trait` in trait in `opt_suggest_box_span`

RPITITs are the only types where their opaque bounds might normalize to some other self type than the opaque type itself. To avoid needing to do normalization, let's just match on either alias kind.

Ideally, we'd just get rid of `opt_suggest_box_span`. It's kind of a wart on type-checking `if`/`match`. I've recently refactored this expression for being confusing/wrong, but moving it into the error path is pretty hard.

Fixes rust-lang#105838
…=jackh726

Split `-Zchalk` flag into `-Ztrait-solver=(classic|chalk|next)` flag

We'll eventually need a way to select more than chalk + not-chalk.

Does this need an MCP since it's touching a `-Z` flag? Or perhaps I should preserve `-Zchalk` for the time being... maybe I could make it a warning to use that flag? cc `@rust-lang/types`

r? types
Point at expressions where inference refines an unexpected type

Fix rust-lang#106355. Fix rust-lang#14007. (!)

```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
  --> src/test/ui/type/type-check/point-at-inference.rs:12:9
   |
9  |         foo.push(i);
   |                  - this is of type `&{integer}`, which makes `foo` to be inferred as `Vec<&{integer}>`
...
12 |     bar(foo);
   |     --- ^^^ expected `i32`, found `&{integer}`
   |     |
   |     arguments to this function are incorrect
   |
   = note: expected struct `Vec<i32>`
              found struct `Vec<&{integer}>`
note: function defined here
  --> src/test/ui/type/type-check/point-at-inference.rs:2:4
   |
2  | fn bar(_: Vec<i32>) {}
   |    ^^^ -----------
help: consider dereferencing the borrow
   |
9  |         foo.push(*i);
   |                  +
```
…, r=cjgillot

Rename `hir::Map::{get_,find_}parent_node` to `hir::Map::{,opt_}parent_id`, and add `hir::Map::{get,find}_parent`

The `hir::Map::get_parent_node` function doesn't return a `Node`, and I think that's quite confusing. Let's rename it to something that sounds more like something that gets the parent hir id => `hir::Map::parent_id`. Same with `find_parent_node` => `opt_parent_id`.

Also, combine `hir.get(hir.parent_id(hir_id))` and similar `hir.find(hir.parent_id(hir_id))` function into new functions that actually retrieve the parent node in one call. This last commit is the only one that might need to be looked at closely.
…-sidebar, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: remove unnecessary wrapper around sidebar and mobile logos

This commit changes `.sidebar a:hover:not(.logo-container)` to add the `:not()` pseudo-class, retaining the old appearance of the logo when mousing over it.

This didn't used to be necessary because the `a.sidebar-logo` was `display:inline`, and was what got the `background` changed on hover, while the `div.logo-container` inside it was `display:block`. This resulted in the hover rule not having any effect, because the logo-container box was not actually nested inside the sidebar-logo box:

https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visuren.html#anonymous-block-level

> When an inline box contains an in-flow block-level box, the inline box (and its inline ancestors within the same line box) are broken around the block-level box (and any block-level siblings that are consecutive or separated only by collapsible whitespace and/or out-of-flow elements), splitting the inline box into two boxes (even if either side is empty), one on each side of the block-level box(es). The line boxes before the break and after the break are enclosed in anonymous block boxes, and the block-level box becomes a sibling of those anonymous boxes. When such an inline box is affected by relative positioning, any resulting translation also affects the block-level box contained in the inline box.
…iler-errors

Tweak wording of fn call with wrong number of args
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 5, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Jan 5, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 5, 2023

📌 Commit 7bbed3e has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 5, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job mingw-check failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
configure: rust.debug-assertions := True
configure: rust.overflow-checks := True
configure: llvm.assertions      := True
configure: dist.missing-tools   := True
configure: build.configure-args := ['--enable-sccache', '--disable-manage-submodu ...
configure: writing `config.toml` in current directory
configure: 
configure: run `python /checkout/x.py --help`
Attempting with retry: make prepare
---
    Checking rustc_codegen_llvm v0.0.0 (/checkout/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm)
error[E0599]: no method named `get_parent_node` found for struct `rustc_middle::hir::map::Map` in the current scope
   --> compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/demand.rs:229:26
    |
229 |         let parent = map.get_parent_node(pat.hir_id);

error[E0599]: no method named `get_parent_node` found for struct `rustc_middle::hir::map::Map` in the current scope
   --> compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/demand.rs:288:30
    |
    |
288 |             let parent = map.get_parent_node(binding.hir_id);

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0599`.
error: could not compile `rustc_hir_typeck` due to 2 previous errors
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...

@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the rollup-rxyftw5 branch August 11, 2023 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants