Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't suggest #[doc(hidden)] trait methods with matching return type #108049

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2023

Conversation

clubby789
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #107983, addressing the bad suggestion.
The test can probably be made more specific to this case, but I'm unsure how.

@rustbot label +A-diagnostics

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 14, 2023

r? @compiler-errors

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints labels Feb 14, 2023
@clubby789 clubby789 force-pushed the dont-suggest-unstable branch from 2b0e3c4 to 28753e2 Compare February 14, 2023 15:09
@mejrs
Copy link
Contributor

mejrs commented Feb 14, 2023

IMO it's overkill to have a blanket ban on suggesting unstable methods. Is there better way to tell whether it's a "you are never meant to use this" method?

@clubby789
Copy link
Contributor Author

clubby789 commented Feb 15, 2023

Checking for #[doc(hidden)] probably makes sense, and works for this issue

@clubby789 clubby789 force-pushed the dont-suggest-unstable branch from 28753e2 to f4de121 Compare February 15, 2023 12:32
@clubby789 clubby789 changed the title Don't suggest unstable trait methods with matching return type Don't suggest #[doc(hidden)] trait methods with matching return type Feb 15, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 15, 2023

📌 Commit f4de121 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 15, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#107034 (Migrating rustc_infer to session diagnostics (part 4))
 - rust-lang#107972 (Fix unintentional UB in ui tests)
 - rust-lang#108010 (Make `InferCtxt::can_eq` and `InferCtxt::can_sub` return booleans)
 - rust-lang#108021 (make x look for x.py if shell script does not exist)
 - rust-lang#108047 (Use `target` instead of `machine` for mir interpreter integer handling.)
 - rust-lang#108049 (Don't suggest `#[doc(hidden)]` trait methods with matching return type)
 - rust-lang#108066 (Better names for illegal impl trait positions)
 - rust-lang#108076 (rustdoc: Use more let chain)
 - rust-lang#108088 (clarify correctness of `black_box`)
 - rust-lang#108094 (Demonstrate I/O in File examples)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 897f56e into rust-lang:master Feb 16, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Feb 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Help is suggesting to use __iterator_get_unchecked
5 participants