-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't suggest #[doc(hidden)]
trait methods with matching return type
#108049
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
labels
Feb 14, 2023
clubby789
force-pushed
the
dont-suggest-unstable
branch
from
February 14, 2023 15:09
2b0e3c4
to
28753e2
Compare
IMO it's overkill to have a blanket ban on suggesting unstable methods. Is there better way to tell whether it's a "you are never meant to use this" method? |
Checking for |
clubby789
force-pushed
the
dont-suggest-unstable
branch
from
February 15, 2023 12:32
28753e2
to
f4de121
Compare
clubby789
changed the title
Don't suggest unstable trait methods with matching return type
Don't suggest Feb 15, 2023
#[doc(hidden)]
trait methods with matching return type
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Feb 15, 2023
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#107034 (Migrating rustc_infer to session diagnostics (part 4)) - rust-lang#107972 (Fix unintentional UB in ui tests) - rust-lang#108010 (Make `InferCtxt::can_eq` and `InferCtxt::can_sub` return booleans) - rust-lang#108021 (make x look for x.py if shell script does not exist) - rust-lang#108047 (Use `target` instead of `machine` for mir interpreter integer handling.) - rust-lang#108049 (Don't suggest `#[doc(hidden)]` trait methods with matching return type) - rust-lang#108066 (Better names for illegal impl trait positions) - rust-lang#108076 (rustdoc: Use more let chain) - rust-lang#108088 (clarify correctness of `black_box`) - rust-lang#108094 (Demonstrate I/O in File examples) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #107983, addressing the bad suggestion.
The test can probably be made more specific to this case, but I'm unsure how.
@rustbot label +A-diagnostics