Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

"Basic usage" is redundant for there is just one example #108130

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2023
Merged

"Basic usage" is redundant for there is just one example #108130

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2023

Conversation

tshepang
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 16, 2023

r? @scottmcm

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 16, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 16, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 19, 2023

📌 Commit 6da6437 has been approved by workingjubilee

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 19, 2023
@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC mentioned this pull request Feb 19, 2023
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2023
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#108228 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-i9t13qu, r=Dylan-DPC
eebdfb5 
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104659 (reflow the stack size story)
 - rust-lang#106933 (Update documentation of select_nth_unstable and select_nth_unstable_by to state O(n^2) complexity)
 - rust-lang#107783 (rustdoc: simplify DOM for `.item-table`)
 - rust-lang#107951 (resolve: Fix doc links referring to other crates when documenting proc macro crates directly)
 - rust-lang#108130 ("Basic usage" is redundant for there is just one example)
 - rust-lang#108146 (rustdoc: hide `reference` methods in search index)
 - rust-lang#108189 (Fix some more `non_lifetime_binders` stuff with higher-ranked trait bounds)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0257e28 into rust-lang:master Feb 19, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Feb 19, 2023
@tshepang tshepang deleted the just-one-example branch February 19, 2023 12:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@scottmcm scottmcm

Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.69.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@tshepang @rustbot @workingjubilee @bors @scottmcm