Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explain compile-time vs run-time difference in env!() error message #108573

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2023

Conversation

kornelski
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is clarifying error message of env!() based on this user question: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/environment-variable-out-dir-is-undefined/90067

It makes it clear that env!() is for env variables defined at compile-time. There's special-case help text for common Cargo build script variables.

I've also rearranged the code to avoid allocating error message on the happy path when the env var is defined.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 28, 2023

r? @WaffleLapkin

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 28, 2023
@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 2, 2023

📌 Commit 2407b0c has been approved by WaffleLapkin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 2, 2023
compiler-errors added a commit to compiler-errors/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2023
Explain compile-time vs run-time difference in env!() error message

This PR is clarifying error message of `env!()` based on this user question: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/environment-variable-out-dir-is-undefined/90067

It makes it clear that `env!()` is for env variables defined at compile-time. There's special-case help text for common Cargo build script variables.

I've also rearranged the code to avoid allocating error message on the happy path when the env var is defined.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2023
Explain compile-time vs run-time difference in env!() error message

This PR is clarifying error message of `env!()` based on this user question: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/environment-variable-out-dir-is-undefined/90067

It makes it clear that `env!()` is for env variables defined at compile-time. There's special-case help text for common Cargo build script variables.

I've also rearranged the code to avoid allocating error message on the happy path when the env var is defined.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#108022 (Support allocations with non-Box<[u8]> bytes)
 - rust-lang#108367 (Re-apply "switch to the macos-12-xl builder")
 - rust-lang#108557 (Point error span at Some constructor argument when trait resolution fails)
 - rust-lang#108573 (Explain compile-time vs run-time difference in env!() error message)
 - rust-lang#108584 (Put backtick content from rustdoc search errors into a `<code>` elements)
 - rust-lang#108624 (Make `ExprKind` the first field in `thir::Expr`)
 - rust-lang#108644 (Allow setting hashmap toml values in `./configure`)
 - rust-lang#108672 (Feed queries on impl side for RPITITs when using lower_impl_trait_in_trait_to_assoc_ty)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 13640e3 into rust-lang:master Mar 3, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Mar 3, 2023
@kornelski kornelski deleted the runtimeenvs branch March 6, 2023 03:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants