-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Still-further-specializable projections are ambiguous in new solver #109619
Merged
bors
merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
compiler-errors:new-solver-still-further-specializable
Mar 26, 2023
Merged
Still-further-specializable projections are ambiguous in new solver #109619
bors
merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
compiler-errors:new-solver-still-further-specializable
Mar 26, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
labels
Mar 25, 2023
Some changes occurred to the core trait solver cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor |
compiler-errors
commented
Mar 26, 2023
rust-cloud-vms
bot
force-pushed
the
new-solver-still-further-specializable
branch
from
March 26, 2023 00:08
f9aad4b
to
3310f72
Compare
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 26, 2023
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2023
…urther-specializable, r=BoxyUwU Still-further-specializable projections are ambiguous in new solver Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/108896/files#r1148450781 r? `@BoxyUwU` (though feel free to re-roll) --- This can be used to create an unsound transmute function with the new solver: ```rust #![feature(specialization)] trait Default { type Id; fn intu(&self) -> &Self::Id; } impl<T> Default for T { default type Id = T; fn intu(&self) -> &Self::Id { self } } fn transmute<T: Default<Id = U>, U: Copy>(t: T) -> U { *t.intu() } use std::num::NonZeroU8; fn main() { let s = transmute::<u8, Option<NonZeroU8>>(0); assert_eq!(s, None); } ```
This was referenced Mar 26, 2023
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#109007 (rustdoc: skip `// some variants omitted` if enum is `#[non_exhaustive]`) - rust-lang#109593 (Rustdoc Book refer to rustdoc::missing_doc_code_examples. Fixes rust-lang#109592.) - rust-lang#109595 (Improve "Auto-hide trait implementation documentation" GUI test) - rust-lang#109619 (Still-further-specializable projections are ambiguous in new solver) - rust-lang#109620 (Correct typo (`back_box` -> `black_box`)) - rust-lang#109621 (Refactor: `VariantIdx::from_u32(0)` -> `FIRST_VARIANT`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/108896/files#r1148450781
r? @BoxyUwU (though feel free to re-roll)
This can be used to create an unsound transmute function with the new solver: