Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use NonNull::new_unchecked and NonNull::len in rustc_arena. #110921

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2023
Merged

Use NonNull::new_unchecked and NonNull::len in rustc_arena. #110921

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2023

Conversation

JohnBobbo96
Copy link
Contributor

@JohnBobbo96 JohnBobbo96 commented Apr 28, 2023

This avoids a few extra dereferences as well as an unwrap.

According to the docs for NonNull::len this also ensures that:

This function is safe, even when the non-null raw slice cannot be dereferenced to a slice because the pointer does not have a valid address.

I am also fairly sure that the unwrap is unneeded in this case, as the docs for Box::into_raw also state:

Consumes the Box, returning a wrapped raw pointer.
The pointer will be properly aligned and non-null.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 28, 2023

r? @b-naber

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 28, 2023
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ impl<T> ArenaChunk<T> {
#[inline]
unsafe fn new(capacity: usize) -> ArenaChunk<T> {
ArenaChunk {
storage: NonNull::new(Box::into_raw(Box::new_uninit_slice(capacity))).unwrap(),
storage: NonNull::new_unchecked(Box::into_raw(Box::new_uninit_slice(capacity))),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a very nice example of why unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn not being on by default is a big mistake. The safety condition of the function (which I actually don't know because it's not documented :/) has nothing to do with the safety condition of new_umchecked.

I'd love to take a PR denying that lint on rustc_arena if you want to.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i have created a PR for this here #110950.

@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

r? Nilstrieb
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2023

📌 Commit 618841b has been approved by Nilstrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rustbot rustbot assigned Noratrieb and unassigned b-naber Apr 28, 2023
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 28, 2023
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ impl<T> ArenaChunk<T> {
#[inline]
unsafe fn new(capacity: usize) -> ArenaChunk<T> {
ArenaChunk {
storage: NonNull::new(Box::into_raw(Box::new_uninit_slice(capacity))).unwrap(),
storage: NonNull::new_unchecked(Box::into_raw(Box::new_uninit_slice(capacity))),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
storage: NonNull::new_unchecked(Box::into_raw(Box::new_uninit_slice(capacity))),
storage: NonNull::from(Box::leak(Box::new_uninit_slice(capacity))),

GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
…=Nilstrieb

Use `NonNull::new_unchecked` and `NonNull::len` in `rustc_arena`.

This avoids a few extra dereferences as well as an `unwrap`.

According to the docs for [`NonNull::len`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ptr/struct.NonNull.html#method.len) this also ensures that:

> This function is safe, even when the non-null raw slice cannot be dereferenced to a slice because the pointer does not have a valid address.

I am also fairly sure that the `unwrap` is unneeded in this case, as the docs for [`Box::into_raw`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/boxed/struct.Box.html#method.into_raw) also state:

> Consumes the Box, returning a wrapped raw pointer.
**The pointer will be properly aligned and non-null.**
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 618841b with merge d1500bb15183239bf2d3423529fe31e86ada738d...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Apr 28, 2023
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

It failed to install awscli, seems spurious.
@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 28, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 618841b with merge 332e1cbb35ef7e9287e50b458751d98390f9612c...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Apr 28, 2023
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 28, 2023
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

@bors treeclosed=50

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Apr 28, 2023

@bors retry

python setuptools issue

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 28, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
…=Nilstrieb

Use `NonNull::new_unchecked` and `NonNull::len` in `rustc_arena`.

This avoids a few extra dereferences as well as an `unwrap`.

According to the docs for [`NonNull::len`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ptr/struct.NonNull.html#method.len) this also ensures that:

> This function is safe, even when the non-null raw slice cannot be dereferenced to a slice because the pointer does not have a valid address.

I am also fairly sure that the `unwrap` is unneeded in this case, as the docs for [`Box::into_raw`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/boxed/struct.Box.html#method.into_raw) also state:

> Consumes the Box, returning a wrapped raw pointer.
**The pointer will be properly aligned and non-null.**
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#110877 (Provide better type hints when a type doesn't support a binary operator)
 - rust-lang#110917 (only error combining +whole-archive and +bundle for rlibs)
 - rust-lang#110921 (Use `NonNull::new_unchecked` and `NonNull::len` in `rustc_arena`.)
 - rust-lang#110927 (Encoder/decoder cleanups)
 - rust-lang#110944 (share BinOp::Offset between CTFE and Miri)
 - rust-lang#110948 (run-make test: using single quotes to not trigger the shell)
 - rust-lang#110957 (Fix an ICE in conflict error diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#110960 (fix false negative for `unused_mut`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4751c85 into rust-lang:master Apr 29, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone Apr 29, 2023
@JohnBobbo96 JohnBobbo96 deleted the rustc_arena_nonnull branch April 29, 2023 21:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants