Clean up usage of cx.tcx when tcx is already set into a variable
#112018
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#108630 (Fix docs for `alloc::realloc`) - rust-lang#109084 (rustc driver: Remove argument 0 before at-expansion to prevent ICE) - rust-lang#111181 (fix(parse): return unpected when current token is EOF) - rust-lang#111656 (Use an unbounded lifetime in `String::leak`.) - rust-lang#111946 (rustdoc: Add `ItemTemplate` trait and related functions to avoid repetitively wrapping existing functions) - rust-lang#112018 (Clean up usage of `cx.tcx` when `tcx` is already set into a variable) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I discovered a few cases where
cx.tcx(and equivalents) was used whereastcxwas already stored into a variable. In those cases, better to just usetcxdirectly.r? @notriddle