Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add fmease to rustdoc review rotations #115342

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2023

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@fmease asked me if it was okay for them to be part of the rustdoc review rotation. Since they are already reviewing a lot of rustdoc PRs, I think it's fine to add them to the rotation.

What do you think @rust-lang/rustdoc ?

r? rust-lang/rustdoc

@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 29, 2023
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

We got all the approvals needed from the rustdoc team so let's approve it.

@bors r=rustdoc rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 5, 2023

📌 Commit b295d3e has been approved by rustdoc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 5, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 5, 2023

⌛ Testing commit b295d3e with merge af488be...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 5, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: rustdoc
Pushing af488be to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 5, 2023
@bors bors merged commit af488be into rust-lang:master Sep 5, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Sep 5, 2023
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the fmease-rotations branch September 5, 2023 11:19
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (af488be): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.2% [2.2%, 2.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 627.647s -> 627.066s (-0.09%)
Artifact size: 316.22 MiB -> 316.15 MiB (-0.02%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants