Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix ui-fulldeps --stage=1 with -Zignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks #116009

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 21, 2023

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Fixes #115977

Also makes sure this doesn't happen again by running ui-fulldeps --stage=1 in CI

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 20, 2023

r? @Kobzol

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 20, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@Kobzol Kobzol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested that it fixes the issue. One small nit regarding CI, otherwise 👍.

src/ci/docker/host-x86_64/x86_64-gnu-llvm-15/script.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Sep 21, 2023

(I approved the PR using GH UI out of habit, lol)

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 21, 2023

📌 Commit 292588e has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 21, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 21, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 292588e with merge 0a689c1...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 21, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Kobzol
Pushing 0a689c1 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 21, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 0a689c1 into rust-lang:master Sep 21, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Sep 21, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0a689c1): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.4% [0.4%, 0.5%] 3
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.4% [0.4%, 0.5%] 3

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.8% [-3.3%, -2.4%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 631.763s -> 630.991s (-0.12%)
Artifact size: 317.88 MiB -> 317.95 MiB (0.02%)

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Sep 21, 2023
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Sep 21, 2023

This only modified tests, so this has to be noise.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. label Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

unknown unstable option: ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks
5 participants