-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 4 pull requests #118942
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 4 pull requests #118942
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…nnethercote Fix cases where std accidentally relied on inline(never) This PR increases the power of `-Zcross-crate-inline-threshold=always` so that it applies through `#[inline(never)]`. Note that though this is called "cross-crate-inlining" in this case especially it is _just_ lazy per-CGU codegen. The MIR inliner and LLVM still respect the attribute as much as they ever have. Trying to bootstrap with the new `-Zcross-crate-inline-threshold=always` change revealed two bugs: We have special intrinsics `assert_inhabited`, `assert_zero_valid`, and `assert_mem_uniniitalized_valid` which codegen backends will lower to nothing or a call to `panic_nounwind`. Since we may not have any call to `panic_nounwind` in MIR but emit one anyway, we need to specially tell `MirUsedCollector` about this situation. `#[lang = "start"]` is special-cased already so that `MirUsedCollector` will collect it, but then when we make it cross-crate-inlinable it is only assigned to a CGU based on whether `MirUsedCollector` saw a call to it, which of course we didn't. --- I started looking into this because rust-lang#118683 revealed a case where we were accidentally relying on a function being `#[inline(never)]`, and cranking up cross-crate-inlinability seems like a way to find other situations like that. r? `@nnethercote` because I don't like what I'm doing to the CGU partitioning code here but I can't come up with something much better
…=notriddle [rustdoc] Use Map instead of Object for source files and search index It's cleaner and is also easier to manipulate `Map` rather than `Object` types. r? `@notriddle`
…, r=lcnr Unconditionally register alias-relate in projection goal Follow-up to rust-lang#118725, which subtly broke closure signature inference on combinators like `Result::map` which I noticed in syn. Essentially, instead of using `eq` which will eagerly infer `?1 := <?2 as Trait>::Assoc`, we can directly emit an alias-relate goal, which will stay ambiguous for as long as `?2` is ambiguous. This also more closely models the conceptual framing that projects-to acts like an alias-relate when solving, and like a normalizes-to when in a param env. r? lcnr
…thlin interpret: extend comment on the inhabitedness check in downcast Cc rust-lang#115145 r? `@saethlin`
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Dec 14, 2023
@bors r+ p=4 rollup=never |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Dec 14, 2023
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2023
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#118770 (Fix cases where std accidentally relied on inline(never)) - rust-lang#118910 ([rustdoc] Use Map instead of Object for source files and search index) - rust-lang#118914 (Unconditionally register alias-relate in projection goal) - rust-lang#118935 (interpret: extend comment on the inhabitedness check in downcast) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Dec 14, 2023
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #118937) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup