Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix arm64e-apple-ios target #119118

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 20, 2023
Merged

Conversation

arttet
Copy link
Contributor

@arttet arttet commented Dec 19, 2023

Now we have warnings such as

'+paca' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
'+pacg' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)

Because we should use LLVM features.

We need to use LLVM features here. Otherwise we get warnings such as
'+paca' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 19, 2023

r? @petrochenkov

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 19, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 19, 2023

These commits modify compiler targets.
(See the Target Tier Policy.)

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 19, 2023

📌 Commit fd0033c has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 19, 2023
compiler-errors added a commit to compiler-errors/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2023
… r=petrochenkov

Fix arm64e-apple-ios target

- [x] [Remove legacy `bitcode` defaults](rust-lang#117364)
- [x] Use LLVM features

Now we have warnings such as

```
'+paca' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
'+pacg' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
```

Because we should use LLVM features.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2023
…mpiler-errors

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#118691 (Add check for possible CStr literals in pre-2021)
 - rust-lang#118973 (rustc_codegen_ssa: Don't drop `IncorrectCguReuseType` , make `rustc_expected_cgu_reuse` attr work)
 - rust-lang#119071 (-Znext-solver: adapt overflow rules to avoid breakage)
 - rust-lang#119089 (effects: fix a comment)
 - rust-lang#119096 (Yeet unnecessary param envs)
 - rust-lang#119118 (Fix arm64e-apple-ios target)
 - rust-lang#119134 (resolve: Feed visibilities for unresolved trait impl items)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
…mpiler-errors

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#118691 (Add check for possible CStr literals in pre-2021)
 - rust-lang#118973 (rustc_codegen_ssa: Don't drop `IncorrectCguReuseType` , make `rustc_expected_cgu_reuse` attr work)
 - rust-lang#119071 (-Znext-solver: adapt overflow rules to avoid breakage)
 - rust-lang#119089 (effects: fix a comment)
 - rust-lang#119096 (Yeet unnecessary param envs)
 - rust-lang#119118 (Fix arm64e-apple-ios target)
 - rust-lang#119134 (resolve: Feed visibilities for unresolved trait impl items)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2023

⌛ Testing commit fd0033c with merge 3095d31...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing 3095d31 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 20, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 3095d31 into rust-lang:master Dec 20, 2023
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Dec 20, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (3095d31): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.1% [-1.1%, -1.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.4% [1.4%, 1.4%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.9% [-1.0%, -0.8%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.4% [-3.4%, -3.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.1% [-1.0%, 1.4%] 3

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 670.994s -> 672.674s (0.25%)
Artifact size: 312.83 MiB -> 312.84 MiB (0.00%)

@arttet arttet deleted the feature/fix-arm64e-targets branch February 26, 2024 12:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants