-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
various const interning cleanups #120302
Merged
Merged
various const interning cleanups #120302
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Jan 24, 2024
Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine cc @rust-lang/miri |
RalfJung
reviewed
Jan 24, 2024
oli-obk
force-pushed
the
const_intern_cleanups
branch
from
January 25, 2024 11:33
17327b7
to
998b3b7
Compare
RalfJung
reviewed
Jan 26, 2024
@rustbot author |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jan 28, 2024
…more projections.
oli-obk
force-pushed
the
const_intern_cleanups
branch
from
January 29, 2024 09:00
998b3b7
to
5d46b98
Compare
oli-obk
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
labels
Jan 29, 2024
RalfJung
reviewed
Feb 5, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
r=me with extra comment
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
@bors r=RalfJung |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Feb 5, 2024
@bors rollup |
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
…alfJung various const interning cleanups After rust-lang#119044 I noticed that some things can be simplified and refactored. This is also a requirement for rust-lang#116564 as there we'll need to treat the base allocation differently from the others r? `@RalfJung`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
…alfJung various const interning cleanups After rust-lang#119044 I noticed that some things can be simplified and refactored. This is also a requirement for rust-lang#116564 as there we'll need to treat the base allocation differently from the others r? ``@RalfJung``
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#120302 (various const interning cleanups) - rust-lang#120520 (Some cleanups around diagnostic levels.) - rust-lang#120521 (Make `NonZero` constructors generic.) - rust-lang#120527 (Switch OwnedStore handle count to AtomicU32) - rust-lang#120564 (coverage: Split out counter increment sites from BCB node/edge counters) - rust-lang#120575 (Simplify codegen diagnostic handling) - rust-lang#120597 (Suggest `[tail @ ..]` on `[..tail]` and `[...tail]` where `tail` is unresolved) - rust-lang#120609 (hir: Stop keeping prefixes for most of `use` list stems) - rust-lang#120633 (pattern_analysis: gather up place-relevant info) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Nadrieril
added a commit
to Nadrieril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2024
…alfJung various const interning cleanups After rust-lang#119044 I noticed that some things can be simplified and refactored. This is also a requirement for rust-lang#116564 as there we'll need to treat the base allocation differently from the others r? ```@RalfJung```
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2024
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#110482 (Add armv8r-none-eabihf target for the Cortex-R52.) - rust-lang#119162 (Add unstable `-Z direct-access-external-data` cmdline flag for `rustc`) - rust-lang#120302 (various const interning cleanups) - rust-lang#120455 ( Add FileCheck annotations to MIR-opt SROA tests) - rust-lang#120470 (Mark "unused binding" suggestion as maybe incorrect) - rust-lang#120479 (Suggest turning `if let` into irrefutable `let` if appropriate) - rust-lang#120564 (coverage: Split out counter increment sites from BCB node/edge counters) - rust-lang#120633 (pattern_analysis: gather up place-relevant info) - rust-lang#120664 (Add parallel rustc ui tests) - rust-lang#120721 (fix `llvm_out` to use the correct LLVM root) - rust-lang#120726 (Don't use bashism in checktools.sh) - rust-lang#120733 (MirPass: make name more const) - rust-lang#120735 (Remove some `unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted` calls) Failed merges: - rust-lang#120727 (exhaustiveness: Prefer "`0..MAX` not covered" to "`_` not covered") r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2024
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#110482 (Add armv8r-none-eabihf target for the Cortex-R52.) - rust-lang#119162 (Add unstable `-Z direct-access-external-data` cmdline flag for `rustc`) - rust-lang#120302 (various const interning cleanups) - rust-lang#120455 ( Add FileCheck annotations to MIR-opt SROA tests) - rust-lang#120470 (Mark "unused binding" suggestion as maybe incorrect) - rust-lang#120479 (Suggest turning `if let` into irrefutable `let` if appropriate) - rust-lang#120564 (coverage: Split out counter increment sites from BCB node/edge counters) - rust-lang#120633 (pattern_analysis: gather up place-relevant info) - rust-lang#120664 (Add parallel rustc ui tests) - rust-lang#120726 (Don't use bashism in checktools.sh) - rust-lang#120733 (MirPass: make name more const) - rust-lang#120735 (Remove some `unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted` calls) - rust-lang#120746 (Record coroutine kind in coroutine generics) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120302 - oli-obk:const_intern_cleanups, r=RalfJung various const interning cleanups After rust-lang#119044 I noticed that some things can be simplified and refactored. This is also a requirement for rust-lang#116564 as there we'll need to treat the base allocation differently from the others r? ````@RalfJung````
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After #119044 I noticed that some things can be simplified and refactored.
This is also a requirement for #116564 as there we'll need to treat the base allocation differently from the others
r? @RalfJung