Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make NonZero::get generic. #120563

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

reitermarkus
Copy link
Contributor

Tracking issue: #120257

Depends on #120521.

r? @dtolnay

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 1, 2024
Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I reviewed the 3rd commit only (the first 2 are identical to #120521 based on commit hash).

Looks good!

#119452 added codegen tests (@AngelicosPhosphoros thank you 👏 👏) so as long as those are good, I am happy with this PR.

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Feb 2, 2024

@bors delegate+

Please rebase after #120521 lands, so we see just get changes in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120563/files, and then approve this yourself. Thanks!

After #120521 is merged and then #120486 is rebased and merged, regardless of whether this PR has been merged by that point, I plan to propose stabilization on #120257. Between the time for the team to approve the stabilization, and land a stabilization PR, and then the nightly and beta period, it will give enough time in my opinion to bail out if anything appears to be going wrong with generic nonzero.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 2, 2024

✌️ @reitermarkus, you can now approve this pull request!

If @dtolnay told you to "r=me" after making some further change, please make that change, then do @bors r=@dtolnay

@reitermarkus
Copy link
Contributor Author

#119452 added codegen tests

Yes, I specifically ran these tests locally, so hopefully should be fine.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 8, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #120521) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@reitermarkus
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=dtolnay

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 8, 2024

📌 Commit 24e2cf0 has been approved by dtolnay

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 8, 2024
oli-obk added a commit to oli-obk/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
…r=dtolnay

Make `NonZero::get` generic.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#120257

Depends on rust-lang#120521.

r? `@dtolnay`
oli-obk added a commit to oli-obk/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
…r=dtolnay

Make `NonZero::get` generic.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#120257

Depends on rust-lang#120521.

r? ``@dtolnay``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#120486 (Use generic `NonZero` internally.)
 - rust-lang#120500 (Implement intrinsics with fallback bodies)
 - rust-lang#120530 (Be less confident when `dyn` suggestion is not checked for object safety)
 - rust-lang#120563 (Make `NonZero::get` generic.)
 - rust-lang#120847 (Continue compilation after check_mod_type_wf errors)
 - rust-lang#120959 (Remove good path delayed bugs)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
oli-obk added a commit to oli-obk/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2024
…r=dtolnay

Make `NonZero::get` generic.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#120257

Depends on rust-lang#120521.

r? ```@dtolnay```
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 16, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 24e2cf0 with merge 439d69c...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2024
…dtolnay

Make `NonZero::get` generic.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#120257

Depends on rust-lang#120521.

r? `@dtolnay`
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 17, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 17, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job aarch64-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
   Compiling mdbook v0.4.37
[RUSTC-TIMING] elasticlunr test:false 5.487
[RUSTC-TIMING] ammonia test:false 5.021
[RUSTC-TIMING] handlebars test:false 10.790
##[error]The runner has received a shutdown signal. This can happen when the runner service is stopped, or a manually started runner is canceled.
##[group]Clock drift check
  local time: Sat Feb 17 00:01:58 UTC 2024
  network time: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 00:01:58 GMT
##[endgroup]
##[endgroup]
Session terminated, killing shell... ...killed.
##[error]The operation was canceled.

@reitermarkus reitermarkus requested a review from dtolnay February 17, 2024 00:50
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Feb 17, 2024

Can't tell what failed.

@bors retry
@bors delegate+

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 17, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 17, 2024

✌️ @reitermarkus, you can now approve this pull request!

If @dtolnay told you to "r=me" after making some further change, please make that change, then do @bors r=@dtolnay

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 17, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 24e2cf0 with merge 4316d0c...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 17, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: dtolnay
Pushing 4316d0c to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 17, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 4316d0c into rust-lang:master Feb 17, 2024
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 17, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4316d0c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.9% [2.9%, 2.9%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.5% [-0.5%, -0.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.5% [-0.5%, -0.5%] 1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-5.1% [-8.0%, -2.3%] 4
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.5% [-5.1%, -3.8%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) -5.1% [-8.0%, -2.3%] 4

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-8.6% [-8.6%, -8.6%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.0% [0.0%, 0.2%] 20
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.9% [0.8%, 0.9%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.3% [-2.4%, -0.1%] 14
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.1% [-2.4%, 0.2%] 34

Bootstrap: 638.214s -> 639.28s (0.17%)
Artifact size: 306.34 MiB -> 306.36 MiB (0.00%)

@reitermarkus reitermarkus deleted the generic-nonzero-get branch February 17, 2024 19:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants