Use optimized fluent_syntax

[clubby789]

Quick check to see if my fluent_syntax patch gives any improvements. (projectfluent/fluent-rs#344)
r? @ghost

[clubby789]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit d61d14a with merge 228db0b...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 228db0b (228db0b1e7646c80f385caf641467bde3f43b15e)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (228db0b): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Warning ⚠: The following benchmark(s) failed to build:

• rustc

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.2%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.5%	[-4.1%, -0.3%]	41
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.2%]	3

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.4%	[3.4%, 3.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.7%	[3.3%, 4.1%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	3.4%	[3.4%, 3.4%]	1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.2%	[-3.0%, -0.8%]	11
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: missing data
Artifact size: 308.58 MiB -> 308.57 MiB (-0.00%)

[clubby789]

Nice 😄