-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Diagnostic renaming 2 #121780
Diagnostic renaming 2 #121780
Conversation
cc @davidtwco, @compiler-errors, @TaKO8Ki Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt cc @rust-lang/rustfmt
cc @davidtwco, @compiler-errors, @TaKO8Ki Some changes occurred in exhaustiveness checking cc @Nadrieril
cc @davidtwco, @compiler-errors, @TaKO8Ki Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine cc @rust-lang/miri Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt The Miri subtree was changed cc @rust-lang/miri |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
a46dda2
to
626f123
Compare
I rebased. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
626f123
to
9a6202a
Compare
I rebased again. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
9a6202a
to
bbd1242
Compare
I rebased a third time. |
@bors r+ Apologies that it took a few days to get to this. |
@bors p=1 Because this is conflict-prone. |
Diagnostic renaming 2 A sequel to rust-lang#121489. r? `@davidtwco`
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #121998) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
When you make a change to the diagnostic lints, it uses the old version of the lints with stage 1 and the new version with stage 2, which often leads to failures in stage 1. Let's just stick to stage 2.
Make it use `impl Into<DiagMessage>` like all the other methods nearby.
bbd1242
to
1cd9574
Compare
I rebased, and added a commit making @bors r=davidtwco |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (1547c07): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 644.326s -> 645.309s (0.15%) |
Presumably the max-rss "regressions" are just noise? This PR just renamed a bunch of stuff, shouldn't have effected performance at all. |
Diagnostic renaming 2 A sequel to rust-lang#121489. r? `@davidtwco`
…rcote Diagnostic renaming 3 A sequel to rust-lang#121780. r? `@davidtwco`
A sequel to rust-lang#1883, this covers diagnostic naming changes from rust-lang/rust/pull/121489, rust-lang/rust/pull/121780, and rust-lang/rust/pull/122132.
A sequel to #1883, this covers diagnostic naming changes from rust-lang/rust/pull/121489, rust-lang/rust/pull/121780, and rust-lang/rust/pull/122132.
Diagnostic renaming 3 A sequel to rust-lang/rust#121780. r? `@davidtwco`
A sequel to #121489.
r? @davidtwco