Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

io::Read trait: make it more clear when we are adressing implementations vs callers #122276

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2024

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Inspired by this comment.

For some reason we only have that buf warning in read and read_exact, even though it affects a bunch of other functions of this trait as well. It doesn't seem worth copy-pasting the same text everywhere though so I did not change this.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 10, 2024

r? @Nilstrieb

rustbot has assigned @Nilstrieb.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 10, 2024
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

That's clearer, thanks!
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 10, 2024

📌 Commit 93049be has been approved by Nilstrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 10, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2024
io::Read trait: make it more clear when we are adressing implementations vs callers

Inspired by [this](rust-lang#72186 (comment)) comment.

For some reason we only have that `buf` warning in `read` and `read_exact`, even though it affects a bunch of other functions of this trait as well. It doesn't seem worth copy-pasting the same text everywhere though so I did not change this.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#121754 ([bootstrap] Move the `split-debuginfo` setting to the per-target section)
 - rust-lang#122205 (ensure that sysroot is properly set for cross-targets)
 - rust-lang#122275 (disable OOM test in Miri)
 - rust-lang#122276 (io::Read trait: make it more clear when we are adressing implementations vs callers)
 - rust-lang#122286 (use Instance::expect_resolve() instead of unwraping Instance::resolve())
 - rust-lang#122290 (MIR printing: print the path of uneval'd const)
 - rust-lang#122293 (diagnostics: Do not suggest using `#[unix_sigpipe]` without a value)
 - rust-lang#122297 (bootstrap: document what the triples in 'Build' mean)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122275 (disable OOM test in Miri)
 - rust-lang#122276 (io::Read trait: make it more clear when we are adressing implementations vs callers)
 - rust-lang#122277 (BorrowedCursor docs clarification)
 - rust-lang#122286 (use Instance::expect_resolve() instead of unwraping Instance::resolve())
 - rust-lang#122290 (MIR printing: print the path of uneval'd const)
 - rust-lang#122293 (diagnostics: Do not suggest using `#[unix_sigpipe]` without a value)
 - rust-lang#122297 (bootstrap: document what the triples in 'Build' mean)
 - rust-lang#122302 (docs: Correct ptr/ref verbiage in SliceIndex docs.)
 - rust-lang#122304 (fix metadata for dyn-star in new solver)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0c73b2d into rust-lang:master Mar 11, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Mar 11, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122276 - RalfJung:io-read, r=Nilstrieb

io::Read trait: make it more clear when we are adressing implementations vs callers

Inspired by [this](rust-lang#72186 (comment)) comment.

For some reason we only have that `buf` warning in `read` and `read_exact`, even though it affects a bunch of other functions of this trait as well. It doesn't seem worth copy-pasting the same text everywhere though so I did not change this.
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the io-read branch March 11, 2024 06:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants