This means `DiagCtxtInner::emit_diagnostic` can return its result
directly, rather than having to modify a local variable.

It has a single call site, and this will enable subsequent refactorings.

It results in a tiny bit of duplication (another
`self.treat_next_err_as_bug()` condition) but I think it's worth it to
get more code into the main `match`.

This will enable additional refactorings.

Note that `self.suppressed_expected_diag` is no longer set for
`ForceWarning`, which is good. Nor is `TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC` called for
`Allow`, which is also good.

Also add an assertion for the levels allowed with `has_future_breakage`.

This match is complex enough that it's a good idea to enumerate every
variant.

This also means `can_be_top_or_sub` can just be `can_be_subdiag`.

Fixes rust-lang#121593

Related to rust-lang#119645

Option::map, for example, looks like this:

    option<t>, (t -> u) -> option<u>

This syntax searches all of the HOFs in Rust: traits Fn, FnOnce,
and FnMut, and bare fn primitives.

It's going to be a no-op on the empty list anyway
(we have plenty of test cases that return nothing)
so why send extra code?

Initialize them before the search index is loaded.

This is implemented, in addition to the ML-style one,
because Rust does it. If we don't, we'll never hear the end of it.

This commit also refactors some duplicate parts of the parser
into a dedicated function.

I've been experimenting with transforming the StableMIR to instrument
the code with potential UB checks. The modified body will only
be used by our analysis tool, however, constants in StableMIR must be
backed by rustc constants. Thus, I'm adding a few functions to build
constants, such as building string and other primitives.

- Replace some nested if-let with let-chains
- Tweak a match pattern to allow shorthand struct syntax
- Fuse an `is_empty` check with getting the last element
- Merge some common code that emits `MalformedAttribute` and continues
- Format `"{tool}::{name}"` in a way that's consistent with other match arms
- Replace if-let-else-panic with let-else
- Use early-exit to flatten a method body

…ine it

…g to know the `Machine` type

…t is in fact about validation failures

… methods

…iper

Add CStr::bytes iterator

See rust-lang/libs-team#135 for an ACP.

Since rust-lang/libs-team#134 was also accepted, this type is now `core::ffi::c_str::Bytes` instead of `core::ffi::CStrBytes`.

unix time module now return result

First try to fix rust-lang#108277 without break anything.

if anyone who read this know tips to be able to check compilation for different target I could use some help. So far I installed many target with rustup but `./x check --all-targets` doesn't seem to use them.

TODO:

- [x] better error
- [ ] test, how ?

`@rustbot` label -S-waiting-on-author +S-waiting-on-review

…-hof, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc-search: search types by higher-order functions

This feature extends rustdoc with syntax and search index information for searching function pointers and closures (Higher-Order Functions, or HOF). Part of rust-lang#60485

This PR adds two syntaxes: a high-level one for finding any kind of HOF, and a direct implementation of the parenthesized path syntax that Rust itself uses.

## Preview pages

| Query | Results |
|-------|---------|
| [`option<T>, (fnonce (T) -> bool) -> option<T>`][optionfilter] | `Option::filter` |
| [`option<T>, (T -> bool) -> option<T>`][optionfilter2] | `Option::filter` |

Updated chapter of the book: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/rustdoc/read-documentation/search.html

[optionfilter]: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=option<T>%2C+(fnonce+(T)+->+bool)+->+option<T>&filter-crate=std
[optionfilter2]: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=option<T>%2C+(T+->+bool)+->+option<T>&filter-crate=std

## Motivation

When type-based search was first landed, it was directly [described as incomplete][a comment].

[a comment]: rust-lang#23289 (comment)

Filling out the missing functionality is going to mean adding support for more of Rust's [type expression] syntax, such as references, raw pointers, function pointers, and closures. This PR adds function pointers and closures.

[type expression]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/types.html#type-expressions

There's been demand for something "like Hoogle, but for Rust" expressed a few times [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/y8sbid/is_there_a_website_like_haskells_hoogle_for_rust/) [2](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/rust-equivalent-of-haskells-hoogle/102280) [3](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/std-library-inclusion-policy/6852/2) [4](https://discord.com/channels/442252698964721669/448238009733742612/1109502307495858216). Some of them just don't realize what functionality already exists ([`Duration -> u64`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/?search=duration%20-%3E%20u64) already works), but a lot of them specifically want to search for higher-order functions like option combinators.

## Guide-level explanation (from the Rustdoc book)

To search for a function that accepts a function as a parameter, like `Iterator::all`, wrap the nested signature in parenthesis, as in [`Iterator<T>, (T -> bool) -> bool`][iterator-all]. You can also search for a specific closure trait, such as `Iterator<T>, (FnMut(T) -> bool) -> bool`, but you need to know which one you want.

[iterator-all]: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=Iterator<T>%2C+(T+->+bool)+->+bool&filter-crate=std

## Reference-level description (also from the Rustdoc book)

### Primitives with Special Syntax

<table>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Shorthand</th>
    <th>Explicit names</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr><td colspan="2">Before this PR</td></tr>
  <tr>
    <td><code>[]</code></td>
    <td><code>primitive:slice</code> and/or <code>primitive:array</code></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><code>[T]</code></td>
    <td><code>primitive:slice&lt;T&gt;</code> and/or <code>primitive:array&lt;T&gt;</code></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><code>!</code></td>
    <td><code>primitive:never</code></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><code>()</code></td>
    <td><code>primitive:unit</code> and/or <code>primitive:tuple</code></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><code>(T)</code></td>
    <td><code>T</code></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><code>(T,)</code></td>
    <td><code>primitive:tuple&lt;T&gt;</code></td>
  </tr>
  <tr><td colspan="2">After this PR</td></tr>
  <tr>
    <td><code>(T, U -> V, W)</code></td>
    <td><code>fn(T, U) -> (V, W)</code>, Fn, FnMut, and FnOnce</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
</table>

The `->` operator has lower precedence than comma. If it's not wrapped in brackets, it delimits the return value for the function being searched for. To search for functions that take functions as parameters, use parenthesis.

### Search query grammar

```ebnf
ident = *(ALPHA / DIGIT / "_")
path = ident *(DOUBLE-COLON ident) [BANG]
slice-like = OPEN-SQUARE-BRACKET [ nonempty-arg-list ] CLOSE-SQUARE-BRACKET
tuple-like = OPEN-PAREN [ nonempty-arg-list ] CLOSE-PAREN
arg = [type-filter *WS COLON *WS] (path [generics] / slice-like / tuple-like)
type-sep = COMMA/WS *(COMMA/WS)
nonempty-arg-list = *(type-sep) arg *(type-sep arg) *(type-sep) [ return-args ]
generic-arg-list = *(type-sep) arg [ EQUAL arg ] *(type-sep arg [ EQUAL arg ]) *(type-sep)
normal-generics = OPEN-ANGLE-BRACKET [ generic-arg-list ] *(type-sep)
            CLOSE-ANGLE-BRACKET
fn-like-generics = OPEN-PAREN [ nonempty-arg-list ] CLOSE-PAREN [ RETURN-ARROW arg ]
generics = normal-generics / fn-like-generics
return-args = RETURN-ARROW *(type-sep) nonempty-arg-list

exact-search = [type-filter *WS COLON] [ RETURN-ARROW ] *WS QUOTE ident QUOTE [ generics ]
type-search = [ nonempty-arg-list ]

query = *WS (exact-search / type-search) *WS

; unchanged parts of the grammar, like the full list of type filters, are omitted
```

## Future direction

### The remaining type expression grammar

As described in rust-lang#118194, this is another step in the type expression grammar: BareFunction, and the function-like mode of TypePath, are now supported.

* RawPointerType and ReferenceType actually are a priority.
* ImplTraitType and TraitObjectType (and ImplTraitTypeOneBound and TraitObjectTypeOneBound) aren't as much of a priority, since they desugar pretty easily.

### Search subtyping and traits

This is the other major factor that makes it less useful than it should be.

* `iterator<result<t>> -> result<t>` doesn't find `Result::from_iter`. You have to search [`intoiterator<result<t>> -> result<t>`](https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=intoiterator%3Cresult%3Ct%3E%3E%20-%3E%20result%3Ct%3E&filter-crate=std). Nobody's going to search for IntoIterator unless they basically already know about it and don't need the search engine anyway.

* Iterator combinators are usually structs that happen to implement Iterator, like `std::iter::Map`.

To solve these cases, it needs to look at trait implementations, knowing that Iterator is a "subtype of" IntoIterator, and Map is a "subtype of" Iterator, so `iterator -> result` is a subtype of `intoiterator -> result` and `iterator<t>, (t -> u) -> iterator<u>` is a subtype of [`iterator<t>, (t -> u) -> map<t -> u>`](https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=iterator%3Ct%3E%2C%20(t%20-%3E%20u)%20-%3E%20map%3Ct%20-%3E%20u%3E&filter-crate=std).

…OSTIC-calls, r=oli-obk

Document `TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC` calls.

r? ````@cjgillot````

…ywiser

Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead

Related to rust-lang#119645

…mease

Mention Register Size in `#[warn(asm_sub_register)]`

Fixes rust-lang#121593

Displays the register size information obtained from `suggest_modifier()` and `default_modifier()`.

…Jung

Various cleanups around the const eval query providers

r? ````@RalfJung````

after this, working on running validation before interning starts with swapping the order of two lines of code

Add methods to create StableMIR constant

I've been experimenting with transforming the StableMIR to instrument the code with potential UB checks.

The modified body will only be used by our analysis tool, however, constants in StableMIR must be backed by rustc constants. Thus, I'm adding a few functions to build constants, such as building string and other primitives.

One question I have is whether we should create a global allocation instead for strings.

r? ```@oli-obk```

Various style improvements to `rustc_lint::levels`

While reading this file, I noticed a few opportunities to make things a little nicer:

- Replace some nested if-let with let-chains
- Tweak a match pattern to allow shorthand struct syntax
- Fuse an `is_empty` check with getting the last element
- Merge some common code that emits `MalformedAttribute` and continues
- Format `"{tool}::{name}"` in a way that's consistent with other match arms
- Replace if-let-else-panic with let-else
- Use early-exit to flatten a method body

Some of these changes cause indentation churn, so ignoring whitespace is recommended.

const-eval: organize and extend tests for required-consts

This includes some tests that are known-broken and hence disabled (due to rust-lang#107503).

r? ```@oli-obk```

…, r=Amanieu

fix unsoundness in Step::forward_unchecked for signed integers

Fixes rust-lang#122420

```rust
pub fn foo(a: i8, b: u8) -> i8 {
    unsafe { a.checked_add_unsigned(b).unwrap_unchecked() }
}
```

still compiles down to a single arithmetic instruction ([godbolt](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/qsd3xYWfE)).

But we may be losing some loop optimizations if llvm can no longer easily derive that it's a finite counted loop from the no-wrapping flags.