Rollup of 10 pull requests #122474
Closed
Rollup of 10 pull requests #122474
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This means `DiagCtxtInner::emit_diagnostic` can return its result directly, rather than having to modify a local variable.
It has a single call site, and this will enable subsequent refactorings.
It results in a tiny bit of duplication (another `self.treat_next_err_as_bug()` condition) but I think it's worth it to get more code into the main `match`.
This will enable additional refactorings.
Note that `self.suppressed_expected_diag` is no longer set for `ForceWarning`, which is good. Nor is `TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC` called for `Allow`, which is also good.
Also add an assertion for the levels allowed with `has_future_breakage`.
This match is complex enough that it's a good idea to enumerate every variant. This also means `can_be_top_or_sub` can just be `can_be_subdiag`.
Option::map, for example, looks like this:
option<t>, (t -> u) -> option<u>
This syntax searches all of the HOFs in Rust: traits Fn, FnOnce,
and FnMut, and bare fn primitives.
It's going to be a no-op on the empty list anyway (we have plenty of test cases that return nothing) so why send extra code?
Initialize them before the search index is loaded.
This is implemented, in addition to the ML-style one, because Rust does it. If we don't, we'll never hear the end of it. This commit also refactors some duplicate parts of the parser into a dedicated function.
I've been experimenting with transforming the StableMIR to instrument the code with potential UB checks. The modified body will only be used by our analysis tool, however, constants in StableMIR must be backed by rustc constants. Thus, I'm adding a few functions to build constants, such as building string and other primitives.
- Replace some nested if-let with let-chains
- Tweak a match pattern to allow shorthand struct syntax
- Fuse an `is_empty` check with getting the last element
- Merge some common code that emits `MalformedAttribute` and continues
- Format `"{tool}::{name}"` in a way that's consistent with other match arms
- Replace if-let-else-panic with let-else
- Use early-exit to flatten a method body
…g to know the `Machine` type
…t is in fact about validation failures
…iper Add CStr::bytes iterator See rust-lang/libs-team#135 for an ACP. Since rust-lang/libs-team#134 was also accepted, this type is now `core::ffi::c_str::Bytes` instead of `core::ffi::CStrBytes`.
unix time module now return result First try to fix rust-lang#108277 without break anything. if anyone who read this know tips to be able to check compilation for different target I could use some help. So far I installed many target with rustup but `./x check --all-targets` doesn't seem to use them. TODO: - [x] better error - [ ] test, how ? ``@rustbot`` label -S-waiting-on-author +S-waiting-on-review
…-hof, r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc-search: search types by higher-order functions This feature extends rustdoc with syntax and search index information for searching function pointers and closures (Higher-Order Functions, or HOF). Part of rust-lang#60485 This PR adds two syntaxes: a high-level one for finding any kind of HOF, and a direct implementation of the parenthesized path syntax that Rust itself uses. ## Preview pages | Query | Results | |-------|---------| | [`option<T>, (fnonce (T) -> bool) -> option<T>`][optionfilter] | `Option::filter` | | [`option<T>, (T -> bool) -> option<T>`][optionfilter2] | `Option::filter` | Updated chapter of the book: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/rustdoc/read-documentation/search.html [optionfilter]: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=option<T>%2C+(fnonce+(T)+->+bool)+->+option<T>&filter-crate=std [optionfilter2]: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=option<T>%2C+(T+->+bool)+->+option<T>&filter-crate=std ## Motivation When type-based search was first landed, it was directly [described as incomplete][a comment]. [a comment]: rust-lang#23289 (comment) Filling out the missing functionality is going to mean adding support for more of Rust's [type expression] syntax, such as references, raw pointers, function pointers, and closures. This PR adds function pointers and closures. [type expression]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/types.html#type-expressions There's been demand for something "like Hoogle, but for Rust" expressed a few times [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/y8sbid/is_there_a_website_like_haskells_hoogle_for_rust/) [2](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/rust-equivalent-of-haskells-hoogle/102280) [3](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/std-library-inclusion-policy/6852/2) [4](https://discord.com/channels/442252698964721669/448238009733742612/1109502307495858216). Some of them just don't realize what functionality already exists ([`Duration -> u64`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/?search=duration%20-%3E%20u64) already works), but a lot of them specifically want to search for higher-order functions like option combinators. ## Guide-level explanation (from the Rustdoc book) To search for a function that accepts a function as a parameter, like `Iterator::all`, wrap the nested signature in parenthesis, as in [`Iterator<T>, (T -> bool) -> bool`][iterator-all]. You can also search for a specific closure trait, such as `Iterator<T>, (FnMut(T) -> bool) -> bool`, but you need to know which one you want. [iterator-all]: https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=Iterator<T>%2C+(T+->+bool)+->+bool&filter-crate=std ## Reference-level description (also from the Rustdoc book) ### Primitives with Special Syntax <table> <thead> <tr> <th>Shorthand</th> <th>Explicit names</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr><td colspan="2">Before this PR</td></tr> <tr> <td><code>[]</code></td> <td><code>primitive:slice</code> and/or <code>primitive:array</code></td> </tr> <tr> <td><code>[T]</code></td> <td><code>primitive:slice<T></code> and/or <code>primitive:array<T></code></td> </tr> <tr> <td><code>!</code></td> <td><code>primitive:never</code></td> </tr> <tr> <td><code>()</code></td> <td><code>primitive:unit</code> and/or <code>primitive:tuple</code></td> </tr> <tr> <td><code>(T)</code></td> <td><code>T</code></td> </tr> <tr> <td><code>(T,)</code></td> <td><code>primitive:tuple<T></code></td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2">After this PR</td></tr> <tr> <td><code>(T, U -> V, W)</code></td> <td><code>fn(T, U) -> (V, W)</code>, Fn, FnMut, and FnOnce</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> The `->` operator has lower precedence than comma. If it's not wrapped in brackets, it delimits the return value for the function being searched for. To search for functions that take functions as parameters, use parenthesis. ### Search query grammar ```ebnf ident = *(ALPHA / DIGIT / "_") path = ident *(DOUBLE-COLON ident) [BANG] slice-like = OPEN-SQUARE-BRACKET [ nonempty-arg-list ] CLOSE-SQUARE-BRACKET tuple-like = OPEN-PAREN [ nonempty-arg-list ] CLOSE-PAREN arg = [type-filter *WS COLON *WS] (path [generics] / slice-like / tuple-like) type-sep = COMMA/WS *(COMMA/WS) nonempty-arg-list = *(type-sep) arg *(type-sep arg) *(type-sep) [ return-args ] generic-arg-list = *(type-sep) arg [ EQUAL arg ] *(type-sep arg [ EQUAL arg ]) *(type-sep) normal-generics = OPEN-ANGLE-BRACKET [ generic-arg-list ] *(type-sep) CLOSE-ANGLE-BRACKET fn-like-generics = OPEN-PAREN [ nonempty-arg-list ] CLOSE-PAREN [ RETURN-ARROW arg ] generics = normal-generics / fn-like-generics return-args = RETURN-ARROW *(type-sep) nonempty-arg-list exact-search = [type-filter *WS COLON] [ RETURN-ARROW ] *WS QUOTE ident QUOTE [ generics ] type-search = [ nonempty-arg-list ] query = *WS (exact-search / type-search) *WS ; unchanged parts of the grammar, like the full list of type filters, are omitted ``` ## Future direction ### The remaining type expression grammar As described in rust-lang#118194, this is another step in the type expression grammar: BareFunction, and the function-like mode of TypePath, are now supported. * RawPointerType and ReferenceType actually are a priority. * ImplTraitType and TraitObjectType (and ImplTraitTypeOneBound and TraitObjectTypeOneBound) aren't as much of a priority, since they desugar pretty easily. ### Search subtyping and traits This is the other major factor that makes it less useful than it should be. * `iterator<result<t>> -> result<t>` doesn't find `Result::from_iter`. You have to search [`intoiterator<result<t>> -> result<t>`](https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=intoiterator%3Cresult%3Ct%3E%3E%20-%3E%20result%3Ct%3E&filter-crate=std). Nobody's going to search for IntoIterator unless they basically already know about it and don't need the search engine anyway. * Iterator combinators are usually structs that happen to implement Iterator, like `std::iter::Map`. To solve these cases, it needs to look at trait implementations, knowing that Iterator is a "subtype of" IntoIterator, and Map is a "subtype of" Iterator, so `iterator -> result` is a subtype of `intoiterator -> result` and `iterator<t>, (t -> u) -> iterator<u>` is a subtype of [`iterator<t>, (t -> u) -> map<t -> u>`](https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-9/search-hof/std/vec/struct.Vec.html?search=iterator%3Ct%3E%2C%20(t%20-%3E%20u)%20-%3E%20map%3Ct%20-%3E%20u%3E&filter-crate=std).
…OSTIC-calls, r=oli-obk Document `TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC` calls. r? ``````@cjgillot``````
…ywiser Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead Related to rust-lang#119645
…Jung Various cleanups around the const eval query providers r? ``````@RalfJung`````` after this, working on running validation before interning starts with swapping the order of two lines of code
Add methods to create StableMIR constant I've been experimenting with transforming the StableMIR to instrument the code with potential UB checks. The modified body will only be used by our analysis tool, however, constants in StableMIR must be backed by rustc constants. Thus, I'm adding a few functions to build constants, such as building string and other primitives. One question I have is whether we should create a global allocation instead for strings. r? `````@oli-obk`````
Various style improvements to `rustc_lint::levels`
While reading this file, I noticed a few opportunities to make things a little nicer:
- Replace some nested if-let with let-chains
- Tweak a match pattern to allow shorthand struct syntax
- Fuse an `is_empty` check with getting the last element
- Merge some common code that emits `MalformedAttribute` and continues
- Format `"{tool}::{name}"` in a way that's consistent with other match arms
- Replace if-let-else-panic with let-else
- Use early-exit to flatten a method body
Some of these changes cause indentation churn, so ignoring whitespace is recommended.
const-eval: organize and extend tests for required-consts This includes some tests that are known-broken and hence disabled (due to rust-lang#107503). r? ````@oli-obk````
…, r=Amanieu fix unsoundness in Step::forward_unchecked for signed integers Fixes rust-lang#122420 ```rust pub fn foo(a: i8, b: u8) -> i8 { unsafe { a.checked_add_unsigned(b).unwrap_unchecked() } } ``` still compiles down to a single arithmetic instruction ([godbolt](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/qsd3xYWfE)). But we may be losing some loop optimizations if llvm can no longer easily derive that it's a finite counted loop from the no-wrapping flags.
rustbot
added
O-unix
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=10 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
@bors p=11 |
|
Overlaps with #122472. |
|
I'll close #122472 |
|
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #122243) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
TRACK_DIAGNOSTICcalls. #120699 (DocumentTRACK_DIAGNOSTICcalls.)rustc_lint::levels#122416 (Various style improvements torustc_lint::levels)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup