Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove check-fast. Closes #4193, #8844, #6330, #7416 #12304

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

brson
Copy link
Contributor

@brson brson commented Feb 16, 2014

No description provided.

@huonw
Copy link
Member

huonw commented Feb 16, 2014

Out of interest, how long does the full test suite take to run on windows? (Also, needs a rebase.)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

I, too, am curious about how this would affect cycle time. We definitely don't want cycle time to go up, so I think we should see how long the suite is on windows before merging.

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Feb 16, 2014

I can run a test.

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Feb 16, 2014

On win1 before removal check-fast took 16m; after, check-lite takes 24m.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

That doesn't sound nearly as bad as I thought it was, but it also may push the windows bots to being the slowest bots. I think that the linux bots would be faster by 10-20min at that point. That doesn't sound too bad, and we could always slim down slower portions of the windows test suite if necessary.

@adrientetar
Copy link
Contributor

It sounds like we could largely speed-up Windows according to #8844 (comment).

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Feb 16, 2014

If check-lite is not fast enough we can change it to test fewer things.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

For the compile-fail test, is it possible to do // ignore-freebsd instead of // ignore-test? It would be a shame to lose them completely.

If so, r=me

klutzy referenced this pull request in klutzy/rust Mar 13, 2014
This fixes struct passing abi on x86 ffi: Structs are now passed
indirectly with byval attribute (as clang does).
@alexcrichton alexcrichton mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2014
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Closing in favor of #13288

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2014
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2014
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2022
…ents, r=jonas-schievink

minor: Include self type in generated getter/setter docs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants