Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unimplemented!() from BinOp::ty() function #123655

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2024

Conversation

celinval
Copy link
Contributor

@celinval celinval commented Apr 8, 2024

To reduce redundancy, we now internalize the BinOp instead of duplicating the ty() function body.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 8, 2024

r? @oli-obk

rustbot has assigned @oli-obk.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 8, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 8, 2024

This PR changes Stable MIR

cc @oli-obk, @celinval, @ouz-a

To reduce redundancy, we now internalize the BinOp instead of
duplicating the `ty()` function body.
@celinval celinval force-pushed the smir-fix-binop-ty branch from 4b62fc8 to 0a4f4a3 Compare April 8, 2024 22:47
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I guess it's much better to avoid reimplementing Binop::ty here.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r=me after CI is green, unless you want a review specifically from oli

@celinval
Copy link
Contributor Author

celinval commented Apr 9, 2024

@bors r=@compiler-errors rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 9, 2024

📌 Commit 0a4f4a3 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 9, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122768 (Use the more informative generic type inference failure error on method calls on raw pointers)
 - rust-lang#123620 (sanitizers: Create the rustc_sanitizers crate)
 - rust-lang#123624 ([rustdoc] [GUI tests] Make theme switching closer to reality)
 - rust-lang#123636 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#123647 (rustdoc: slightly clean up the synthesis of blanket impls)
 - rust-lang#123648 (Avoid ICEing without the pattern_types feature gate)
 - rust-lang#123649 (KCFI: Use legal charset in shim encoding)
 - rust-lang#123652 (Fix UI tests with dist-vendored dependencies)
 - rust-lang#123655 (Remove unimplemented!() from BinOp::ty() function)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9ea1063 into rust-lang:master Apr 9, 2024
11 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123655 - celinval:smir-fix-binop-ty, r=compiler-errors

Remove unimplemented!() from BinOp::ty() function

To reduce redundancy, we now internalize the BinOp instead of duplicating the `ty()` function body.
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Apr 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants