Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite handling of universe-leaking placeholder regions into outlives constraints #123720

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 3, 2024

Conversation

amandasystems
Copy link
Contributor

This commit prepares for Polonius by moving handling of leak check/universe errors out of the inference step by rewriting any universe error into an outlives-static constraint.

This variant is a work in progress but seems to pass most tests.

Note that a few debug assertions no longer hold; a few extra eyes on those changes are appreciated!

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 10, 2024

r? @davidtwco

rustbot has assigned @davidtwco.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 10, 2024
@amandasystems
Copy link
Contributor Author

amandasystems commented Apr 10, 2024

?r @nikomatsakis

(it's not 100% ready for review yet probably maybe, but I figured I might as well start the PR now)

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

the syntax is r? nikomatsakis 😆

@rustbot rustbot assigned nikomatsakis and unassigned davidtwco Apr 10, 2024
@amandasystems
Copy link
Contributor Author

the syntax is r? nikomatsakis 😆

That’s funny because I tried that first, thought I made a mistake, and went back to “fix” it

@amandasystems
Copy link
Contributor Author

amandasystems commented Apr 12, 2024

Update: I had a brainwave during my investigations of the failing UI tests (there's 20-ish of them if you enable the new logic everywhere, depending on whether you count duplicates). I tried adding a new constraint category so that I could easily not blame it (ever, actually), and that reduces the errors down to one, tiny span diff:

---- [ui] tests/ui/higher-ranked/trait-bounds/due-to-where-clause.rs stdout ----
diff of stderr:

2         --> $DIR/due-to-where-clause.rs:2:5
3          |
4       LL |     test::<FooS>(&mut 42);
-          |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^ implementation of `Foo` is not general enough
+          |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ implementation of `Foo` is not general enough
6          |
7          = note: `FooS<'_>` must implement `Foo<'0>`, for any lifetime `'0`...
8          = note: ...but `FooS<'_>` actually implements `Foo<'1>`, for some specific lifetime `'1`

I'm pretty confident this works now. Removing the WIP label!

@amandasystems amandasystems changed the title [WIP] Rewrite handling of universe-leaking placeholder regions into outlives constraints Rewrite handling of universe-leaking placeholder regions into outlives constraints Apr 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Efficiency nit

compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/constraints/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/constraints/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 12, 2024
@amandasystems
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think it's ready for a perf run, @lqd!

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Apr 12, 2024

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 12, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 12, 2024

⌛ Trying commit 5a1c148 with merge 1b9e1e6...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2024
…=<try>

Rewrite handling of universe-leaking placeholder regions into outlives constraints

This commit prepares for Polonius by moving handling of leak check/universe errors out of the inference step by rewriting any universe error into an outlives-static constraint.

This variant is a work in progress but seems to pass most tests.

Note that a few debug assertions no longer hold; a few extra eyes on those changes are appreciated!
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, so, I reviewed and left a (tiny) nit. I don't know that a perf run is really needed, this is pretty clearly grossly inefficient. That's precisely what I expected, of course.

r=me but I'd like to hand this off to somebody else to drive over the finish line

compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/constraints/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/constraints/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/constraints/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 12, 2024

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 1b9e1e6 (1b9e1e65acb35d4d1d734c6461ace5c4e50a9fd0)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (1b9e1e6): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Warning ⚠: The following benchmark(s) failed to build:

  • rustc
  • wg-grammar
  • webrender-2022

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
113.9% [0.3%, 3862.1%] 236
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
393.2% [0.1%, 7855.4%] 184
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 113.9% [0.3%, 3862.1%] 236

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.7% [-10.5%, -0.7%] 57
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-5.6% [-7.4%, -3.5%] 21
All ❌✅ (primary) -3.7% [-10.5%, -0.7%] 57

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
215.7% [0.9%, 3636.4%] 98
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1147.6% [1.0%, 7887.5%] 61
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 215.7% [0.9%, 3636.4%] 98

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: missing data
Artifact size: 315.97 MiB -> 305.14 MiB (-3.43%)

@rustbot rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Apr 13, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 16, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #124015) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@amandasystems
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is my first crater run so I'm not sure how to read the logs, but most of those errors look spurious to me, if not all of them.

This version is a squash-rebased version of a series
of exiermental commits, since large parts of them
were broken out into PR rust-lang#125069.

It explicitly handles universe violations in higher-kinded
outlives constraints by adding extra outlives static constraints.
@amandasystems
Copy link
Contributor Author

r=me with a nit

Nit addressed (and I agree, that's just the sort of bad naming I know has confused me before)

@amandasystems
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nikomatsakis, @lqd: I have added a description for why this was done in commit 9be3a3d. Check if it looks ok to you!

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 2, 2024

📌 Commit 9be3a3d has been approved by nikomatsakis

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 2, 2024

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 2, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 3, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 9be3a3d with merge 67f0d43...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 3, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nikomatsakis
Pushing 67f0d43 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 3, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 67f0d43 into rust-lang:master Jul 3, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jul 3, 2024
@amandasystems amandasystems deleted the dyn-enable-refactor branch July 3, 2024 05:09
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (67f0d43): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.3% [1.2%, 1.4%] 6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results (primary 2.2%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.2% [2.2%, 2.2%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.2% [2.2%, 2.2%] 1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 696.719s -> 695.519s (-0.17%)
Artifact size: 327.57 MiB -> 327.72 MiB (0.05%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the perf-regression Performance regression. label Jul 3, 2024
@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Jul 8, 2024

This is my first crater run so I'm not sure how to read the logs, but most of those errors look spurious to me, if not all of them.

Agreed, most of the 12 "regressions" look like crater errors. Since these crates not tested in the run however, I've checked them all locally: they build with this PR without issues.

We'll keep an eye out for possible new issues, and beta crater run regressions, that could be bisected to this PR, just in case the "spurious regressed" contains real effects (these can also be crater errors, but also contains OOMs).

But things look currently fine in my opinion.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
…mpletely, r=<try>

[WIP] Remove placeholders completely

This PR does shotgun surgery on borrowck to remove all special handling of placeholders, completely replacing them with a preprocessing step that rewrites placeholder leaks into constraints, removing constraint propagation of placeholders and all logic used to detect placeholder violations during error reporting. This finishes what rust-lang#123720 started.

The new method works like this:
1. during SCC construction, some information about SCC membership and reachability is retained
2. just after SCC construction, a constraint `r - (from: to_invalid) - > 'static` is added when `r` is the representative of an SCC and
   1. that SCC either has had its universe shrunk because it reaches a region with a smaller one (in which case `to_invalid` is the smallest-universed region it reaches), or if it reaches a region with a too large universe that isn't part of the SCC (in which case `to_invalid` is the region with a too large universe). In either case, `from` is also `r`.
 2.  some region `reaches` in `r`'s SCC reaches another placeholder, `reached`, in which case the added constraint is `r -> (reaches: reached) 'static`. Through clever choice of defaults (chosing minimum elements), `reached` will be `r` if at all possible.

When tracing errors for diagnostics one of these special constraints along a path are treated much like a HTTP redirect: if we are explaining `from: to` and reach an edge with `reaches: invalid` we stop the search and start following `reaches: invalid` instead. When doing this the implicit edges `x: 'static` for every region `x` are ignored, since the search would otherwise be able to cheat by going through 'static and re-find the same edge again.

A bunch of optimisations are possible:
- Conservatively add constraints, e.g. one per SCC. May worsen error tracing!
- as a final pass, allow fusing the annotations for the SCC after adding the extra constraints to remove unnecessary information and save memory. This could be done cheaply since we already iterate over the entire SCC.
- currently, if constraints are added the entire set of SCCs are recomputed. This is of course rather wasteful, and we could maybe do better.

There are a bunch of rather nice bonuses:
- We now don't need to expose region indices in `MirTypeckRegionConstraints` to the entire crate. The only entry point is `placeholder_region()` so correctness of the indices is now guaranteed
- A lot of things that were previously iterations over lists is now a single lookup
- The constraint graph search functions are simple and at least one of them can now take a proper region as target rather than a predicate function. The only case that needs the predicate argument  to `find_constraint_path_to()` is `find_sub_region_live_at()`, which may or may not be possible to work around.

 r​? nikomatsakis
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
…mpletely, r=<try>

[WIP] Remove placeholders completely

This PR does shotgun surgery on borrowck to remove all special handling of placeholders, completely replacing them with a preprocessing step that rewrites placeholder leaks into constraints, removing constraint propagation of placeholders and all logic used to detect placeholder violations during error reporting. This finishes what rust-lang#123720 started.

The new method works like this:
1. during SCC construction, some information about SCC membership and reachability is retained
2. just after SCC construction, a constraint `r - (from: to_invalid) - > 'static` is added when `r` is the representative of an SCC and
   1. that SCC either has had its universe shrunk because it reaches a region with a smaller one (in which case `to_invalid` is the smallest-universed region it reaches), or if it reaches a region with a too large universe that isn't part of the SCC (in which case `to_invalid` is the region with a too large universe). In either case, `from` is also `r`.
 2.  some region `reaches` in `r`'s SCC reaches another placeholder, `reached`, in which case the added constraint is `r -> (reaches: reached) 'static`. Through clever choice of defaults (chosing minimum elements), `reached` will be `r` if at all possible.

When tracing errors for diagnostics one of these special constraints along a path are treated much like a HTTP redirect: if we are explaining `from: to` and reach an edge with `reaches: invalid` we stop the search and start following `reaches: invalid` instead. When doing this the implicit edges `x: 'static` for every region `x` are ignored, since the search would otherwise be able to cheat by going through 'static and re-find the same edge again.

A bunch of optimisations are possible:
- ~~Conservatively add constraints, e.g. one per SCC. May worsen error tracing!~~
- as a final pass, allow fusing the annotations for the SCC after adding the extra constraints to remove unnecessary information and save memory. This could be done cheaply since we already iterate over the entire set of SCCs.
- currently, if constraints are added the entire set of SCCs are recomputed. This is of course rather wasteful, and we could do better. Especially since SCCs are added in dependency order. This would require a fully separate SCC module since the dynamic SCC combo we'd need now shares almost no properties with regular SCC computation. Given that this is meant to be a temporary work-around, that seems like too much work.

There are a bunch of rather nice bonuses:
- We now don't need to expose region indices in `MirTypeckRegionConstraints` to the entire crate. The only entry point is `placeholder_region()` so correctness of the indices is now guaranteed
- A lot of things that were previously iterations over lists is now a single lookup
- The constraint graph search functions are simple and at least one of them can now take a proper region as target rather than a predicate function. The only case that needs the predicate argument  to `find_constraint_path_to()` is `find_sub_region_live_at()`, which may or may not be possible to work around.

 r​? nikomatsakis
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
…mpletely, r=<try>

[WIP] Remove placeholders completely

This PR does shotgun surgery on borrowck to remove all special handling of placeholders, completely replacing them with a preprocessing step that rewrites placeholder leaks into constraints, removing constraint propagation of placeholders and all logic used to detect placeholder violations during error reporting. This finishes what rust-lang#123720 started.

The new method works like this:
1. during SCC construction, some information about SCC membership and reachability is retained
2. just after SCC construction, a constraint `r - (from: to_invalid) - > 'static` is added when `r` is the representative of an SCC and
   1. that SCC either has had its universe shrunk because it reaches a region with a smaller one (in which case `to_invalid` is the smallest-universed region it reaches), or if it reaches a region with a too large universe that isn't part of the SCC (in which case `to_invalid` is the region with a too large universe). In either case, `from` is also `r`.
 2.  some region `reaches` in `r`'s SCC reaches another placeholder, `reached`, in which case the added constraint is `r -> (reaches: reached) 'static`. Through clever choice of defaults (chosing minimum elements), `reached` will be `r` if at all possible.

When tracing errors for diagnostics one of these special constraints along a path are treated much like a HTTP redirect: if we are explaining `from: to` and reach an edge with `reaches: invalid` we stop the search and start following `reaches: invalid` instead. When doing this the implicit edges `x: 'static` for every region `x` are ignored, since the search would otherwise be able to cheat by going through 'static and re-find the same edge again.

A bunch of optimisations are possible:
- ~~Conservatively add constraints, e.g. one per SCC. May worsen error tracing!~~
- as a final pass, allow fusing the annotations for the SCC after adding the extra constraints to remove unnecessary information and save memory. This could be done cheaply since we already iterate over the entire set of SCCs.
- currently, if constraints are added the entire set of SCCs are recomputed. This is of course rather wasteful, and we could do better. Especially since SCCs are added in dependency order. This would require a fully separate SCC module since the dynamic SCC combo we'd need now shares almost no properties with regular SCC computation. Given that this is meant to be a temporary work-around, that seems like too much work.

There are a bunch of rather nice bonuses:
- We now don't need to expose region indices in `MirTypeckRegionConstraints` to the entire crate. The only entry point is `placeholder_region()` so correctness of the indices is now guaranteed
- A lot of things that were previously iterations over lists is now a single lookup
- The constraint graph search functions are simple and at least one of them can now take a proper region as target rather than a predicate function. The only case that needs the predicate argument  to `find_constraint_path_to()` is `find_sub_region_live_at()`, which may or may not be possible to work around.

 r​? nikomatsakis
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2024
…mpletely, r=<try>

[WIP] Remove placeholders completely

This PR does shotgun surgery on borrowck to remove all special handling of placeholders, completely replacing them with a preprocessing step that rewrites placeholder leaks into constraints, removing constraint propagation of placeholders and all logic used to detect placeholder violations during error reporting. This finishes what rust-lang#123720 started.

The new method works like this:
1. during SCC construction, some information about SCC membership and reachability is retained
2. just after SCC construction, a constraint `r - (from: to_invalid) - > 'static` is added when `r` is the representative of an SCC and
   1. that SCC either has had its universe shrunk because it reaches a region with a smaller one (in which case `to_invalid` is the smallest-universed region it reaches), or if it reaches a region with a too large universe that isn't part of the SCC (in which case `to_invalid` is the region with a too large universe). In either case, `from` is also `r`.
 2.  some region `reaches` in `r`'s SCC reaches another placeholder, `reached`, in which case the added constraint is `r -> (reaches: reached) 'static`. Through clever choice of defaults (chosing minimum elements), `reached` will be `r` if at all possible.

When tracing errors for diagnostics one of these special constraints along a path are treated much like a HTTP redirect: if we are explaining `from: to` and reach an edge with `reaches: invalid` we stop the search and start following `reaches: invalid` instead. When doing this the implicit edges `x: 'static` for every region `x` are ignored, since the search would otherwise be able to cheat by going through 'static and re-find the same edge again.

A bunch of optimisations are possible:
- ~~Conservatively add constraints, e.g. one per SCC. May worsen error tracing!~~
- as a final pass, allow fusing the annotations for the SCC after adding the extra constraints to remove unnecessary information and save memory. This could be done cheaply since we already iterate over the entire set of SCCs.
- currently, if constraints are added the entire set of SCCs are recomputed. This is of course rather wasteful, and we could do better. Especially since SCCs are added in dependency order. This would require a fully separate SCC module since the dynamic SCC combo we'd need now shares almost no properties with regular SCC computation. Given that this is meant to be a temporary work-around, that seems like too much work.

There are a bunch of rather nice bonuses:
- We now don't need to expose region indices in `MirTypeckRegionConstraints` to the entire crate. The only entry point is `placeholder_region()` so correctness of the indices is now guaranteed
- A lot of things that were previously iterations over lists is now a single lookup
- The constraint graph search functions are simple and at least one of them can now take a proper region as target rather than a predicate function. The only case that needs the predicate argument  to `find_constraint_path_to()` is `find_sub_region_live_at()`, which may or may not be possible to work around.

 r​? nikomatsakis
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
…mpletely, r=<try>

[WIP] Remove placeholders completely

This PR does shotgun surgery on borrowck to remove all special handling of placeholders, completely replacing them with a preprocessing step that rewrites placeholder leaks into constraints, removing constraint propagation of placeholders and all logic used to detect placeholder violations during error reporting. This finishes what rust-lang#123720 started.

The new method works like this:
1. during SCC construction, some information about SCC membership and reachability is retained
2. just after SCC construction, a constraint `r - (from: to_invalid) - > 'static` is added when `r` is the representative of an SCC and
   1. that SCC either has had its universe shrunk because it reaches a region with a smaller one (in which case `to_invalid` is the smallest-universed region it reaches), or if it reaches a region with a too large universe that isn't part of the SCC (in which case `to_invalid` is the region with a too large universe). In either case, `from` is also `r`.
 2.  some region `reaches` in `r`'s SCC reaches another placeholder, `reached`, in which case the added constraint is `r -> (reaches: reached) 'static`. Through clever choice of defaults (chosing minimum elements), `reached` will be `r` if at all possible.

When tracing errors for diagnostics one of these special constraints along a path are treated much like a HTTP redirect: if we are explaining `from: to` and reach an edge with `reaches: invalid` we stop the search and start following `reaches: invalid` instead. When doing this the implicit edges `x: 'static` for every region `x` are ignored, since the search would otherwise be able to cheat by going through 'static and re-find the same edge again.

A bunch of optimisations are possible:
- ~~Conservatively add constraints, e.g. one per SCC. May worsen error tracing!~~
- as a final pass, allow fusing the annotations for the SCC after adding the extra constraints to remove unnecessary information and save memory. This could be done cheaply since we already iterate over the entire set of SCCs.
- currently, if constraints are added the entire set of SCCs are recomputed. This is of course rather wasteful, and we could do better. Especially since SCCs are added in dependency order. This would require a fully separate SCC module since the dynamic SCC combo we'd need now shares almost no properties with regular SCC computation. Given that this is meant to be a temporary work-around, that seems like too much work.

There are a bunch of rather nice bonuses:
- We now don't need to expose region indices in `MirTypeckRegionConstraints` to the entire crate. The only entry point is `placeholder_region()` so correctness of the indices is now guaranteed
- A lot of things that were previously iterations over lists is now a single lookup
- The constraint graph search functions are simple and at least one of them can now take a proper region as target rather than a predicate function. The only case that needs the predicate argument  to `find_constraint_path_to()` is `find_sub_region_live_at()`, which may or may not be possible to work around.

 r​? nikomatsakis
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.