-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove direct dependencies on lazy_static, once_cell and byteorder #124475
Conversation
r? @onur-ozkan rustbot has assigned @onur-ozkan. Use |
These commits modify the If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged. The Miri subtree was changed cc @rust-lang/miri Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt cc @rust-lang/rustfmt |
The functionality of all three crates is now available in the standard library.
ac7f7ed
to
a0a8442
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
0303df0
to
8aa3c59
Compare
Nice! @bors r+ |
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#124269 (Pretty-print parenthesis around binary in postfix match) - rust-lang#124415 (Use probes more aggressively in new solver) - rust-lang#124475 (Remove direct dependencies on lazy_static, once_cell and byteorder) - rust-lang#124484 (Fix rust-lang#124478 - offset_of! returns a temporary) - rust-lang#124504 (Mark unions non-const-propagatable in `KnownPanicsLint` without calling layout) - rust-lang#124508 (coverage: Avoid hard-coded values when visiting logical ops) - rust-lang#124522 ([Refactor] Rename `Lint` and `LintGroup`'s `is_loaded` to `is_externally_loaded` ) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124475 - GKFX:more-dependency-pruning, r=oli-obk Remove direct dependencies on lazy_static, once_cell and byteorder The relevant functionality of all three crates is now available and stable in the standard library, i.e. `std::sync::OnceLock` and `{integer}::to_le_bytes`. I think waiting for `LazyLock` (rust-lang#109736) would give marginally more concise code, but not by much.
The relevant functionality of all three crates is now available and stable in the standard library, i.e.
std::sync::OnceLock
and{integer}::to_le_bytes
. I think waiting forLazyLock
(#109736) would give marginally more concise code, but not by much.