Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 4 pull requests #124811

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 6, 2024
Merged

Rollup of 4 pull requests #124811

merged 8 commits into from
May 6, 2024

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

tbu- and others added 8 commits April 29, 2024 21:22
Also mention that there might be leftover directories in the error case.
Document that `create_dir_all` calls `mkdir`/`CreateDirW` multiple times
Prefer lower vtable candidates in select in new solver

Also, adjust the select visitor to only winnow when the *parent* goal is `Certainty::Yes`. This means that we won't winnow in cases when we have any ambiguous inference guidance from two candidates.

r? lcnr
…c, r=lcnr

Don't consider candidates with no failing where clauses when refining obligation causes in new solver

Improves error messages when we have param-env candidates that don't deeply unify (i.e. after alias-bounds).

r? lcnr
Use `super_fold` in `RegionsToStatic` visitor

so as to avoid an infinite stack cycle

fixes rust-lang#124805
r? lcnr
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) rollup A PR which is a rollup labels May 6, 2024
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 6, 2024

📌 Commit ad73b16 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 6, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 6, 2024

⌛ Testing commit ad73b16 with merge 3111015...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 6, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 3111015 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 6, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 3111015 into rust-lang:master May 6, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 6, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#124520 Document that create_dir_all calls mkdir/CreateDirW m… f06ef0a59658a9a6bdf4ea4015b98cbda2dbed65 (link)
#124724 Prefer lower vtable candidates in select in new solver 9ec73f84dc3e1161878c010824db815cf38b3d02 (link)
#124771 Don't consider candidates with no failing where clauses whe… 4b3ad825e634e8246e2363127a1581642fc1d34a (link)
#124808 Use super_fold in RegionsToStatic visitor 9c596cb1e51fd147cc7e8170dd36be4479fbde53 (link)

previous master: fc47cf38e5

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (3111015): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.8% [-1.8%, -1.8%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.8% [-1.8%, -1.8%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-6.0% [-6.3%, -5.8%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 676.942s -> 676.377s (-0.08%)
Artifact size: 315.88 MiB -> 315.98 MiB (0.03%)

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-4zpov13 branch September 1, 2024 17:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants