Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

next_power_of_two: add a doctest to show what happens on 0 #124838

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2024

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@RalfJung RalfJung commented May 7, 2024

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 7, 2024

r? @scottmcm

rustbot has assigned @scottmcm.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 7, 2024
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

scottmcm commented May 7, 2024

@bors r+ rollup=always

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 7, 2024

📌 Commit 776f182 has been approved by scottmcm

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 7, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request May 7, 2024
…tmcm

next_power_of_two: add a doctest to show what happens on 0
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request May 7, 2024
…tmcm

next_power_of_two: add a doctest to show what happens on 0
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 7, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124223 (coverage: Branch coverage support for let-else and if-let)
 - rust-lang#124571 (coverage: Clean up `mcdc_bitmap_bytes` and `conditions_num`)
 - rust-lang#124838 (next_power_of_two: add a doctest to show what happens on 0)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
…tmcm

next_power_of_two: add a doctest to show what happens on 0
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
…tmcm

next_power_of_two: add a doctest to show what happens on 0
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
…tmcm

next_power_of_two: add a doctest to show what happens on 0
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124470 (std::net: Socket::new_raw now set to SO_NOSIGPIPE on freebsd.)
 - rust-lang#124782 (add note about `AlreadyExists` to `create_new`)
 - rust-lang#124788 (Convert instances of `target_os = "macos"` to `target_vendor = "apple"`)
 - rust-lang#124838 (next_power_of_two: add a doctest to show what happens on 0)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ceb5ec3 into rust-lang:master May 8, 2024
6 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124838 - RalfJung:next_power_of_two, r=scottmcm

next_power_of_two: add a doctest to show what happens on 0
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 8, 2024
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the next_power_of_two branch May 8, 2024 11:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants