Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics #125210

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

fmease
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease commented May 17, 2024

Several diagnostics contained their error code inside their primary message which is no bueno.
This PR moves them out of the message and turns them into structured error codes.

Also fixes another occurrence of -> after a selector in a Fluent message which is not correct. I've fixed two other instances of this issue in #104345 (2022) but didn't update all instances as I've noted here: #104345 (comment) (“the future is now!”).

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 17, 2024

r? @davidtwco

rustbot has assigned @davidtwco.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 17, 2024
@fmease
Copy link
Member Author

fmease commented May 17, 2024

@bors rollup

@fmease fmease added the C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. label May 17, 2024
@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@fmease fmease added S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 21, 2024
@fmease fmease force-pushed the fix-up-some-diags branch from 62f49c2 to ae49dbe Compare May 22, 2024 20:42
@fmease fmease added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. labels May 22, 2024
@fmease fmease closed this May 22, 2024
@fmease fmease reopened this May 22, 2024
@fmease
Copy link
Member Author

fmease commented May 22, 2024

rebased
@bors r=davidtwco rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 22, 2024

📌 Commit ae49dbe has been approved by davidtwco

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 22, 2024
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics

Several diagnostics contained their error code inside their primary message which is no bueno.
This PR moves them out of the message and turns them into structured error codes.

Also fixes another occurrence of `->` after a selector in a Fluent message which is not correct. I've fixed two other instances of this issue in rust-lang#104345 (2022) but didn't update all instances as I've noted here: rust-lang#104345 (comment) (“the future is now!”).
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics

Several diagnostics contained their error code inside their primary message which is no bueno.
This PR moves them out of the message and turns them into structured error codes.

Also fixes another occurrence of `->` after a selector in a Fluent message which is not correct. I've fixed two other instances of this issue in rust-lang#104345 (2022) but didn't update all instances as I've noted here: rust-lang#104345 (comment) (“the future is now!”).
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122665 (Add some tests for public-private dependencies.)
 - rust-lang#125210 (Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#125316 (Tweak `Spacing` use)
 - rust-lang#125401 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-scrape-examples-macros` to `rmake.rs`)
 - rust-lang#125406 (Directly add extension instead of using `Path::with_extension`)
 - rust-lang#125409 (Rename `FrameworkOnlyWindows` to `RawDylibOnlyWindows`)
 - rust-lang#125416 (Use correct param-env in `MissingCopyImplementations`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122665 (Add some tests for public-private dependencies.)
 - rust-lang#125210 (Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#125316 (Tweak `Spacing` use)
 - rust-lang#125401 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-scrape-examples-macros` to `rmake.rs`)
 - rust-lang#125406 (Directly add extension instead of using `Path::with_extension`)
 - rust-lang#125409 (Rename `FrameworkOnlyWindows` to `RawDylibOnlyWindows`)
 - rust-lang#125416 (Use correct param-env in `MissingCopyImplementations`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics

Several diagnostics contained their error code inside their primary message which is no bueno.
This PR moves them out of the message and turns them into structured error codes.

Also fixes another occurrence of `->` after a selector in a Fluent message which is not correct. I've fixed two other instances of this issue in rust-lang#104345 (2022) but didn't update all instances as I've noted here: rust-lang#104345 (comment) (“the future is now!”).
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#125165 (Migrate `run-make/pgo-branch-weights` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#125210 (Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#125224 (Migrate `run-make/issue-53964` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#125227 (Migrate `run-make/issue-30063` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#125383 (Rewrite `emit`, `mixing-formats` and `bare-outfile` `run-make` tests in `rmake.rs` format)
 - rust-lang#125401 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-scrape-examples-macros` to `rmake.rs`)
 - rust-lang#125409 (Rename `FrameworkOnlyWindows` to `RawDylibOnlyWindows`)
 - rust-lang#125416 (Use correct param-env in `MissingCopyImplementations`)
 - rust-lang#125421 (Rewrite `core-no-oom-handling`, `issue-24445` and `issue-38237` `run-make` tests to new `rmake.rs` format)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics

Several diagnostics contained their error code inside their primary message which is no bueno.
This PR moves them out of the message and turns them into structured error codes.

Also fixes another occurrence of `->` after a selector in a Fluent message which is not correct. I've fixed two other instances of this issue in rust-lang#104345 (2022) but didn't update all instances as I've noted here: rust-lang#104345 (comment) (“the future is now!”).
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#125210 (Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#125224 (Migrate `run-make/issue-53964` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#125227 (Migrate `run-make/issue-30063` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#125383 (Rewrite `emit`, `mixing-formats` and `bare-outfile` `run-make` tests in `rmake.rs` format)
 - rust-lang#125401 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-scrape-examples-macros` to `rmake.rs`)
 - rust-lang#125409 (Rename `FrameworkOnlyWindows` to `RawDylibOnlyWindows`)
 - rust-lang#125416 (Use correct param-env in `MissingCopyImplementations`)
 - rust-lang#125421 (Rewrite `core-no-oom-handling`, `issue-24445` and `issue-38237` `run-make` tests to new `rmake.rs` format)
 - rust-lang#125438 (Remove unneeded string conversion)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124297 (Allow coercing functions whose signature differs in opaque types in their defining scope into a shared function pointer type)
 - rust-lang#124516 (Allow monomorphization time const eval failures if the cause is a type layout issue)
 - rust-lang#124976 (rustc: Use `tcx.used_crates(())` more)
 - rust-lang#125210 (Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#125409 (Rename `FrameworkOnlyWindows` to `RawDylibOnlyWindows`)
 - rust-lang#125416 (Use correct param-env in `MissingCopyImplementations`)
 - rust-lang#125421 (Rewrite `core-no-oom-handling`, `issue-24445` and `issue-38237` `run-make` tests to new `rmake.rs` format)
 - rust-lang#125438 (Remove unneeded string conversion)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 337987b into rust-lang:master May 23, 2024
7 of 12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 23, 2024
@fmease fmease deleted the fix-up-some-diags branch May 23, 2024 14:53
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125210 - fmease:fix-up-some-diags, r=davidtwco

Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics

Several diagnostics contained their error code inside their primary message which is no bueno.
This PR moves them out of the message and turns them into structured error codes.

Also fixes another occurrence of `->` after a selector in a Fluent message which is not correct. I've fixed two other instances of this issue in rust-lang#104345 (2022) but didn't update all instances as I've noted here: rust-lang#104345 (comment) (“the future is now!”).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants