Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(rustc): Improve discoverable of Cargo docs #126356

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

epage
Copy link
Contributor

@epage epage commented Jun 12, 2024

In preparing Cargo's blog post for 1.80, I tried to find the documentation for the lint configuration and I couldn't. The link is only visible from the lint itself, which isn't where I started, and the side bar, which was collapsed for me.

The first place I went was the docs for unexpected_cfgs because this is configuration for that lint. If using lint configuration were a one off, I could see skipping it here. However, when we discussed this with at least one T-compiler member, there was interest in using this for other lints in the future. To that end, it seems like we should be exposing this with the lint itself.

The second place I checked was the check-cfg documentation. This now has a call out for the sub-page.

This is the first time we have a lint with configuration exposed in
`Cargo.toml`.
When this was done, interest was expressed in using this for other cases
in the future.
To this end, we need to make the documentation for the lint
configuration discoverable from the documentation for that lint.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 12, 2024

r? @lcnr

rustbot has assigned @lcnr.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 12, 2024

Some changes occurred in src/doc/rustc/src/check-cfg.md

cc @Urgau

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 12, 2024
src/doc/rustc/src/check-cfg.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/doc/rustc/src/check-cfg.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/doc/rustc/src/check-cfg.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@epage epage force-pushed the check-cfg branch 2 times, most recently from 438c79c to e171e64 Compare June 12, 2024 21:01
@Urgau
Copy link
Member

Urgau commented Jun 12, 2024

Thanks! Looks good to me.

@bors r+ rollup
r? @Urgau

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 12, 2024

📌 Commit e171e64 has been approved by Urgau

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rustbot rustbot assigned Urgau and unassigned lcnr Jun 12, 2024
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 12, 2024
compiler-errors added a commit to compiler-errors/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
docs(rustc): Improve discoverable of Cargo docs

In preparing Cargo's blog post for 1.80, I tried to find the documentation for the lint configuration and I couldn't.  The link is only visible from the lint itself, which isn't where I started, and the side bar, which was collapsed for me.

The first place I went was the docs for `unexpected_cfgs` because this is configuration for that lint.  If using lint configuration were a one off, I could see skipping it here.  However, when we discussed this with at least one T-compiler member, there was interest in using this for other lints in the future.  To that end, it seems like we should be exposing this with the lint itself.

The second place I checked was the `check-cfg` documentation.  This now has a call out for the sub-page.
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
docs(rustc): Improve discoverable of Cargo docs

In preparing Cargo's blog post for 1.80, I tried to find the documentation for the lint configuration and I couldn't.  The link is only visible from the lint itself, which isn't where I started, and the side bar, which was collapsed for me.

The first place I went was the docs for `unexpected_cfgs` because this is configuration for that lint.  If using lint configuration were a one off, I could see skipping it here.  However, when we discussed this with at least one T-compiler member, there was interest in using this for other lints in the future.  To that end, it seems like we should be exposing this with the lint itself.

The second place I checked was the `check-cfg` documentation.  This now has a call out for the sub-page.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#125165 (Migrate `run-make/pgo-branch-weights` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#125674 (Rewrite `symlinked-extern`, `symlinked-rlib` and `symlinked-libraries` `run-make` tests in `rmake.rs` format)
 - rust-lang#125688 (Walk into alias-eq nested goals even if normalization fails)
 - rust-lang#126142 (Harmonize using root or leaf obligation in trait error reporting)
 - rust-lang#126303 (Urls to docs in rust_hir)
 - rust-lang#126328 (Add Option::is_none_or)
 - rust-lang#126337 (Add test for walking order dependent opaque type behaviour)
 - rust-lang#126351 (std::unix::fs::link using direct linkat call for Solaris.)
 - rust-lang#126353 (Move `MatchAgainstFreshVars` to old solver)
 - rust-lang#126356 (docs(rustc): Improve discoverable of Cargo docs)
 - rust-lang#126362 (Make `try_from_target_usize` method public)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#125674 (Rewrite `symlinked-extern`, `symlinked-rlib` and `symlinked-libraries` `run-make` tests in `rmake.rs` format)
 - rust-lang#125688 (Walk into alias-eq nested goals even if normalization fails)
 - rust-lang#126142 (Harmonize using root or leaf obligation in trait error reporting)
 - rust-lang#126303 (Urls to docs in rust_hir)
 - rust-lang#126328 (Add Option::is_none_or)
 - rust-lang#126337 (Add test for walking order dependent opaque type behaviour)
 - rust-lang#126353 (Move `MatchAgainstFreshVars` to old solver)
 - rust-lang#126356 (docs(rustc): Improve discoverable of Cargo docs)
 - rust-lang#126358 (safe transmute: support `Single` enums)
 - rust-lang#126362 (Make `try_from_target_usize` method public)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9d946a3 into rust-lang:master Jun 13, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jun 13, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126356 - epage:check-cfg, r=Urgau

docs(rustc): Improve discoverable of Cargo docs

In preparing Cargo's blog post for 1.80, I tried to find the documentation for the lint configuration and I couldn't.  The link is only visible from the lint itself, which isn't where I started, and the side bar, which was collapsed for me.

The first place I went was the docs for `unexpected_cfgs` because this is configuration for that lint.  If using lint configuration were a one off, I could see skipping it here.  However, when we discussed this with at least one T-compiler member, there was interest in using this for other lints in the future.  To that end, it seems like we should be exposing this with the lint itself.

The second place I checked was the `check-cfg` documentation.  This now has a call out for the sub-page.
@epage epage deleted the check-cfg branch June 13, 2024 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants