-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 5 pull requests #126397
Rollup of 5 pull requests #126397
Conversation
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Since we support solaris 11 and macOs Sierra as minimum, we can get rid of the runtime overhead.
For PGO/coverage tests that don't need to build or run an actual artifact, we can use `-Zno-profiler-runtime` to run the test even when the profiler runtime is not available.
The profiler runtime is no longer built in mingw test jobs, so these tests should naturally be skipped by `//@ needs-profiler-support`.
Don't build a broken/untested profiler runtime on mingw targets Context: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Why.20build.20a.20broken.2Funtested.20profiler.20runtime.20on.20mingw.3F rust-lang#75872 added `--enable-profiler` to the `x86_64-mingw` job (to cause some additional tests to run), but had to also add `//@ ignore-windows-gnu` to all of the tests that rely on the profiler runtime actually *working*, because it's broken on that target. We can achieve a similar outcome by going through all the `//@ needs-profiler-support` tests that don't actually need to produce/run a binary, and making them use `-Zno-profiler-runtime` instead, so that they can run even in configurations that don't have the profiler runtime available. Then we can remove `--enable-profiler` from `x86_64-mingw`, and still get the same amount of testing. This PR also removes `--enable-profiler` from the mingw dist builds, since it is broken/untested on that target. Those builds have had that flag for a very long time.
change method resolution to constrain hidden types instead of rejecting method candidates Some of these are in probes and may affect inference. This is therefore a breaking change. This allows new code to compile on stable: ```rust trait Trait {} impl Trait for u32 {} struct Bar<T>(T); impl Bar<u32> { fn foo(self) {} } fn foo(x: bool) -> Bar<impl Sized> { if x { let x = foo(false); x.foo(); //^ this used to not find the `foo` method, because while we did equate `x`'s type with possible candidates, we didn't allow opaque type inference while doing so } todo!() } ``` r? `@compiler-errors` fixes rust-lang#121404 cc rust-lang#116652
[1/2] clean-up / general improvements This PR applies various clippy suggestions on the tools. I have only applied the ones that make sense and left out trivial changes (e.g., suggestions like 'remove &' are ignored to keep the original commit history for the lines). I am planning to do the same for the library and compiler, but those will add too many changes to this PR, so I will handle them in a separate PR later.
Avoid ICES after reporting errors on erroneous patterns fixes rust-lang#109812 fixes rust-lang#125914 fixes rust-lang#124004
std::unix::fs::link using direct linkat call for Solaris. Since we support solaris 11 as minimum, we can get rid of the runtime overhead. try-job: dist-various-2
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #126396) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Successful merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup