Rollup of 11 pull requests #127400
Closed
Rollup of 11 pull requests #127400
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: tison <wander4096@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: tison <wander4096@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: tison <wander4096@gmail.com>
…olnay impl PathBuf::add_extension and Path::with_added_extension See the ACP for motivation and discussions - rust-lang/libs-team#368
out_of_scope_macro_calls: Detect calls inside attributes more precisely Fixes rust-lang#126984.
…=pnkfelix Improve dead code analysis Fixes rust-lang#120770 1. check impl items later if self ty is private although the trait method is public, cause we must use the ty firstly if it's private 2. mark the adt live if it appears in pattern, like generic argument, this implies the use of the adt 3. based on the above, we can handle the case that private adts impl Default, so that we don't need adding rustc_trivial_field_reads on Default, and the logic in should_ignore_item r? `@pnkfelix`
Improve well known value check-cfg diagnostic for the standard library
This PR adjust the current logic for hidding the rustc/Cargo suggestion to add a value to a well-known name to exclude the standard library and rustc crates.
This is done in order to improve the contributor experience, in particular when adding a new target, which often requires adding some cfgs like `target_os` which may not be available yet in stage0.
<details>
The diagnostic code would look like this.
```text
error: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `blable`
--> library/core/src/lib.rs:369:7
|
369 | #[cfg(target_os = "blable")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `android`, `cuda`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `macos`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `openbsd`, `psp`, `redox`, `solaris`, `solid_asp3`, `teeos`, `tvos`, `uefi`, `unknown`, `visionos`, `vita`, `vxworks`, `wasi`, `watchos`, and `windows` and 2 more
= help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
= help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[lints.rust]
unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(target_os, values("blable"))'] }
= help: or consider adding `println!("cargo::rustc-check-cfg=cfg(target_os, values(\"blable\"))");` to the top of the `build.rs`
= note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
= note: `-D unexpected-cfgs` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(unexpected_cfgs)]`
```
</details>
…ain, r=lcnr Split `SolverDelegate` back out from `InferCtxtLike` This is because in order to uplift things like the `Generalizer` and other `TypeRelation`s, we want to be able to interface with `InferCtxtLike` (and `InferCtxt` as its implementation), rather that `SolverDelegate`, which only really exists as a hack to be able to define some downstream methods in `rustc_type_ir`. r? lcnr
…adability, r=Amanieu Improve readability of some fmt code examples Some indent was weird. Some examples were too long (overall better to keep it to maximum 80 columns, but only changed the most outstanding ones). r? ``@Amanieu``
…r-errors Use `ControlFlow` results for visitors that are only looking for a single value These visitors all had a `Option<Value>` or `bool` field, that, once set, was never unset or modified again. They have been refactored by removing the field and returning `ControlFlow` directly from the visitor
Added dots at the sentence ends of rustc AST doc Just a tiny improvement for the AST documentation by bringing consistency to sentence ends. I intentionally didn't terminate every sentence, there are still some members not having them, but at least there's no mixing style on the type level.
…021, r=Nadrieril Match ergonomics 2024: align with RFC again - `&` matches `&mut` on old editions - Add some more tests r? ``@Nadrieril`` cc rust-lang#123076 ``@rustbot`` label A-edition-2024 A-patterns
…rrors Use verbose style for argument removal suggestion
Remove clubby789 from review rotation These days I'm unfortunately too busy to be able to take up reviews, and it looks like some PRs have been blocked on this 😓
rustbot
added
A-meta
rustbot
added
WG-trait-system-refactor
|
This isn't overly ambitious, right? @bors r+ rollup=never p=11 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2024
…kingjubilee Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#123600 (impl PathBuf::add_extension and Path::with_added_extension) - rust-lang#126987 (out_of_scope_macro_calls: Detect calls inside attributes more precisely) - rust-lang#127107 (Improve dead code analysis) - rust-lang#127221 (Improve well known value check-cfg diagnostic for the standard library) - rust-lang#127333 (Split `SolverDelegate` back out from `InferCtxtLike`) - rust-lang#127363 (Improve readability of some fmt code examples) - rust-lang#127366 (Use `ControlFlow` results for visitors that are only looking for a single value) - rust-lang#127368 (Added dots at the sentence ends of rustc AST doc) - rust-lang#127369 (Match ergonomics 2024: align with RFC again) - rust-lang#127383 (Use verbose style for argument removal suggestion) - rust-lang#127393 (Remove clubby789 from review rotation) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
SolverDelegateback out fromInferCtxtLike#127333 (SplitSolverDelegateback out fromInferCtxtLike)ControlFlowresults for visitors that are only looking for a single value #127366 (UseControlFlowresults for visitors that are only looking for a single value)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup