-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create opaque definitions in resolver. #129493
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Aug 24, 2024
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
cjgillot
force-pushed
the
early-opaque-def
branch
from
August 24, 2024 02:44
c77925b
to
e3f7b82
Compare
petrochenkov
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Aug 27, 2024
cjgillot
force-pushed
the
early-opaque-def
branch
from
August 27, 2024 21:22
e3f7b82
to
db08c17
Compare
cjgillot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
labels
Aug 31, 2024
r=me after squashing. |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Aug 31, 2024
cjgillot
force-pushed
the
early-opaque-def
branch
from
August 31, 2024 20:04
db08c17
to
885a6ce
Compare
cjgillot
force-pushed
the
early-opaque-def
branch
from
August 31, 2024 20:14
885a6ce
to
f68f665
Compare
cjgillot
commented
Sep 1, 2024
} | ||
} | ||
ExprKind::Gen(_, _, _, _) => { | ||
ExprKind::Closure(..) | ExprKind::Gen(..) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI, I simplified the Closure
arm to just create the def-id, like other branches do. There is no additional behaviour change.
@bors r=petrochenkov |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
labels
Sep 1, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128495 (core: use `compare_bytes` for more slice element types) - rust-lang#128641 (refactor: standardize duplicate processes in parser) - rust-lang#129207 (Lint that warns when an elided lifetime ends up being a named lifetime) - rust-lang#129493 (Create opaque definitions in resolver.) - rust-lang#129619 (Update stacker to 0.1.17) - rust-lang#129672 (Make option-like-enum.rs UB-free and portable) - rust-lang#129780 (add crashtests for several old unfixed ICEs) - rust-lang#129832 (Remove stray dot in `std::char::from_u32_unchecked` documentation) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#129493 - cjgillot:early-opaque-def, r=petrochenkov Create opaque definitions in resolver. Implementing rust-lang#129023 (comment) That was easier than I expected. r? `@petrochenkov`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implementing #129023 (comment)
That was easier than I expected.
r? @petrochenkov