Ensure that tail expr receive lifetime extension #129627
Open
+21
−6
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @jieyouxu |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
traviscross
reviewed
Aug 27, 2024
Open
13 tasks
jieyouxu
reviewed
Aug 27, 2024
jieyouxu
added
S-waiting-on-author
alex-semenyuk
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
@dingxiangfei2009 any updates on this? thanks |
|
I will update the PR this week. I am priortising the lint over the additional test fixture to finish cooking lint ASAP. |
|
@dingxiangfei2009 any updates on this? |
|
@Dylan-DPC Thanks for the reminder. The PR is ready for review again. @rustbot ready |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
dingxiangfei2009
force-pushed
the
ensure-tail-expr-in-let-block-works
branch
from
75aa56a
to
aee8152
Compare
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Nov 11, 2024
|
@bors delegate+ |
|
✌️ @dingxiangfei2009, you can now approve this pull request! If @jieyouxu told you to " |
bors
removed
the
S-waiting-on-review
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
@bors rollup |
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
…in-let-block-works, r=jieyouxu Ensure that tail expr receive lifetime extension cc `@jieyouxu` `@traviscross` It just came to me that we should add a test to make sure that we honor the contract from the temporary lifetime rule rust-lang#121346. We should continue to implement this rule in Edition 2021 onward and shorter tail expression lifetime should not override it. This is a small PR to improve our assurance and establish a stronger contract. Tracked by rust-lang#123739
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#129627 (Ensure that tail expr receive lifetime extension) - rust-lang#130999 (Implement file_lock feature) - rust-lang#132873 (handle separate prefixes in clippy rules) - rust-lang#132891 (Remove `rustc_session::config::rustc_short_optgroups`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
cc @jieyouxu @traviscross
It just came to me that we should add a test to make sure that we honor the contract from the temporary lifetime rule #121346. We should continue to implement this rule in Edition 2021 onward and shorter tail expression lifetime should not override it.
This is a small PR to improve our assurance and establish a stronger contract.
Tracked by #123739