Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert space-saving operations #130940

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

@workingjubilee workingjubilee commented Sep 27, 2024

The "all of our artifacts" mv seems like it may save enough space to matter sometimes, since it can range up to a gigabyte of difference, if memory serves. For the rest, I think we're good.

r? @Kobzol

try-job: dist-aarch64-apple

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 27, 2024
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Sep 27, 2024

@bors try

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
…perations, r=<try>

Revert space-saving operations

The "all of our artifacts" `mv` seems like it may save enough space to matter sometimes, since it can range up to a gigabyte of difference, if memory serves. For the rest, I think we're good.

try-job:  dist-aarch64-apple
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2024

⌛ Trying commit 1220721 with merge 2446b98...

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

This partially reverts commit fe7c97c.

I kept a mv, not a cp, for the one that shuffles major artifacts around,
because the size of those artifacts are big enough to matter, sometimes.
I don't think the diagnostic info will be that heavy, by comparison.
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Sep 27, 2024

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2024

⌛ Trying commit a2a4ea0 with merge f32e6e9...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
…perations, r=<try>

Revert space-saving operations

The "all of our artifacts" `mv` seems like it may save enough space to matter sometimes, since it can range up to a gigabyte of difference, if memory serves. For the rest, I think we're good.

try-job: dist-aarch64-apple
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2024

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: f32e6e9 (f32e6e90e42b2e5ce39c38dff781b534d77bbf79)

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Sep 27, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2024

📌 Commit a2a4ea0 has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 27, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#125404 (Fix `read_buf` uses in `std`)
 - rust-lang#130866 (Allow instantiating object trait binder when upcasting)
 - rust-lang#130922 (Reference UNSPECIFIED instead of INADDR_ANY in join_multicast_v4)
 - rust-lang#130924 (Make clashing_extern_declarations considering generic args for ADT field)
 - rust-lang#130939 (rustdoc: update `ProcMacro` docs section on helper attributes)
 - rust-lang#130940 (Revert space-saving operations)
 - rust-lang#130944 (Allow instantiating trait object binder in ptr-to-ptr casts)
 - rust-lang#130953 (Rename a few tests to make tidy happier)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 6b5cd4e into rust-lang:master Sep 28, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.83.0 milestone Sep 28, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130940 - workingjubilee:remove-space-saving-operations, r=Kobzol

Revert space-saving operations

The "all of our artifacts" `mv` seems like it may save enough space to matter sometimes, since it can range up to a gigabyte of difference, if memory serves. For the rest, I think we're good.

try-job: dist-aarch64-apple
@workingjubilee workingjubilee deleted the remove-space-saving-operations branch September 28, 2024 23:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants